Acceptable risk as a basis for design

作者: J.K. Vrijling , W. van Hengel , R.J. Houben

DOI: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00135-X

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Historically, human civilisations have striven to protect themselves against natural and man-made hazards. The degree of protection is a matter political choice. Today this choice should be expressed in terms risk acceptable probability failure form the basis probabilistic design protection. It additionally argued that for certain technology connected made cost-benefit framework. benefits costs including are weighed decision process. A set rules evaluation proposed tested cases. leads technical advice question has decided politically.

参考文章(7)
C. Starr, Social Benefit versus Technological Risk Science. ,vol. 165, pp. 1232- 1238 ,(1969) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.165.3899.1232
Johannes Kornelis Vrijling, Wim Van Hengel, RJ Houben, None, A framework for risk evaluation Journal of Hazardous Materials. ,vol. 43, pp. 245- 261 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0304-3894(95)91197-V
Paul Slovic, Sarah Lichtenstein, Baruch Fischhoff, Modeling the Societal Impact of Fatal Accidents Management Science. ,vol. 30, pp. 464- 474 ,(1984) , 10.1287/MNSC.30.4.464
D. van Dantzig, Economic Decision Problems for Flood Prevention Econometrica. ,vol. 24, pp. 276- ,(1956) , 10.2307/1911632
J.K. Vrijling, P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder, Societal Risk and the Concept of Risk Aversion Elsevier. pp. 45- 52 ,(1997) , 10.1016/B978-008042835-2/50005-9
Baruch Fischhoff, Psychology and Public Policy: Tool or Toolmaker? American Psychologist. ,vol. 45, pp. 647- 653 ,(1990) , 10.1037/H0091626
Robert Reiff, Psychology and public policy. Professional Psychology. ,vol. 1, pp. 315- 330 ,(1970) , 10.1037/H0029707