Para‐aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

作者: L. Schwarz , R. M. Lupinacci , M. Svrcek , M. Lesurtel , M. Bubenheim

DOI: 10.1002/BJS.9444

关键词:

摘要: Background The significance of positive para-aortic nodes in patients with resectable pancreatic carcinoma is unclear. This study sought to evaluate the accuracy intraoperative detection and prognostic these lymph resected adenocarcinoma head. Methods From 2000 2010, node sampling was performed prospectively all before pancreatoduodenectomy. Frozen sections were created categorized as or negative for metastases. Surgeons blinded frozen-section results. followed by standard histopathological assessment corresponding paraffin-embedded, haematoxylin eosin-stained material. Nodes considered uninvolved this analysis examined immunohistochemically micrometastases. Results A total 111 consecutive included, a median follow-up 20·8 (range 1·5–126) months. The 1-, 2- 5-year overall survival (OS) disease-free (DFS) rates 73·6, 54·0 24·7 per cent, 51·8, 28·1 18·8 cent respectively. Para-aortic involvement always associated peripancreatic metastasis, detected 12 eosin staining 17. Sensitivity specificity examination detecting metastases 71 100 Median OS without on 9·7 versus 28·5 months respectively (P = 0·012), 15·7 27·2 months (P = 0·050) when assessed staining. DFS 5·6 12·9 months (P = 0·041), 8·4 (P = 0·038) analysis. presence micrometastases not significantly altered DFS. Conclusion Para-aortic detects distant lymphatic reliably. It should be systematically. When are found, they contraindication resection.

参考文章(46)
Masato Kayahara, Takukazu Nagakawa, Tetsuo Ohta, Hirohisa Kitagawa, Keiichi Ueno, Hidehiro Tajima, Ayman Elnemr, Koichi Miwa, Analysis of paraaortic lymph node involvement in pancreatic carcinoma: a significant indication for surgery? Cancer. ,vol. 85, pp. 583- 590 ,(1999) , 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990201)85:3<583::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO;2-J
TNM classification of malignant tumours Published in <b>2010</b> in Chichester, West Sussex, UK ;Hoboken, NJ by Wiley-Blackwell. ,(1987) , 10.1007/978-3-642-82982-6
日本膵臓学会, Classification of pancreatic carcinoma Kanehara & Co.. ,(2003)
A. R. Moossa, Rounak Nassirpour, Michael Bouvet, Robert M. Hoffman, Meng Yang, Ping Jiang, Jinwei Wang, Eugene Baranov, Stephanie R. Nardin, Real-Time Optical Imaging of Primary Tumor Growth and Multiple Metastatic Events in a Pancreatic Cancer Orthotopic Model Cancer Research. ,vol. 62, pp. 1534- 1540 ,(2002)
Tony J.C. Wang, John Allendorf, Muhammad Wasif Saif, Yuxia Jia, Management of Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Journal of the Pancreas. ,vol. 13, pp. 147- 150 ,(2012) , 10.6092/1590-8577/695
Ioannis Hatzaras, Nathaniel George, Peter Muscarella, W. Scott Melvin, E. Christopher Ellison, Mark Bloomston, Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgical Oncology. ,vol. 17, pp. 991- 997 ,(2010) , 10.1245/S10434-009-0883-9
M LESURTEL, N DEHNI, E TIRET, R PARC, F PAYE, Palliative surgery for unresectable pancreatic and periampullary cancer: a reappraisal. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. ,vol. 10, pp. 286- 291 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.GASSUR.2005.05.011
Hiroshi Kurahara, Sonshin Takao, Kousei Maemura, Hiroyuki Shinchi, Shoji Natsugoe, Takashi Aikou, Impact of Lymph Node Micrometastasis in Patients with Pancreatic Head Cancer World Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 31, pp. 483- 490 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S00268-006-0463-0
Antonio L. Cubilla, Joseph Fortner, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, Lymph node involvement in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas area Cancer. ,vol. 41, pp. 880- 887 ,(1978) , 10.1002/1097-0142(197803)41:3<880::AID-CNCR2820410315>3.0.CO;2-J