Magnetically induced electrostimulation of human osteoblasts results in enhanced cell viability and osteogenic differentiation

作者: BETTINA HIEMER , JOSEFIN ZIEBART , ANIKA JONITZ-HEINCKE , PHILIP CHRISTIAN GRUNERT , YUKUN SU

DOI: 10.3892/IJMM.2016.2590

关键词:

摘要: The application of electromagnetic fields to support the bone-healing processes is a therapeutic approach for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. ASNIS-III s-series screw bone stimulation system providing stimulation; however, its influence on human osteoblasts (hOBs) has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, in present study, impact this viability and differentiation hOBs was examined. We used s terms specific experimental test set-up. (EMF, 3 mT, 20 Hz) combined an additional alternating electric field (EMF + EF) (3 Hz, 700 mV). primary conducted times per day 45 min over period 72 h. Unstimulated cells served as controls. Subsequently, viability, gene expression markers pro-collagen type 1 synthesis stimulated corresponding controls were both EMF EF using revealed positive cell moderately increased compared unstimulated Stimulation resulted slightly enhanced collagen osteocalcin; significant increase alkaline phosphatase (1.4-fold) osteocalcin (1.6-fold) levels, notable levels runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX-2; 1.54-fold). Our findings demonstrate that regards osteoblastic markers.

参考文章(41)
Richard Balint, Nigel J. Cassidy, Sarah H. Cartmell, Electrical Stimulation: A Novel Tool for Tissue Engineering Tissue Engineering Part B-reviews. ,vol. 19, pp. 48- 57 ,(2013) , 10.1089/TEN.TEB.2012.0183
Masashi Tabata, Toru Shimoda, Kazumasa Sugihara, Daisuke Ogomi, Hajime Ohgushi, Mitsuru Akashi, Apatite formed on/in agarose gel as a bone-grafting material in the treatment of periodontal infrabony defect Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. ,vol. 75B, pp. 378- 386 ,(2005) , 10.1002/JBM.B.30316
S. Vimalraj, B. Arumugam, P.J. Miranda, N. Selvamurugan, Runx2: Structure, function, and phosphorylation in osteoblast differentiation International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. ,vol. 78, pp. 202- 208 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2015.04.008
C. H. Lohmann, Z. Schwartz, Y. Liu, H. Guerkov, D. D. Dean, B. Simon, B. D. Boyan, Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of MG63 osteoblast-like cells affects differentiation and local factor production. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. ,vol. 18, pp. 637- 646 ,(2000) , 10.1002/JOR.1100180417
L. Fassina, L. Visai, M.G. Cusella De Angelis, F. Benazzo, G. Magenes, Surface modification of a porous polyurethane through a culture of human osteoblasts and an electromagnetic bioreactor Technology and Health Care. ,vol. 15, pp. 33- 45 ,(2006) , 10.3233/THC-2007-15104
Marie Hronik-Tupaj, William L Rice, Mark Cronin-Golomb, David L Kaplan, Irene Georgakoudi, Osteoblastic differentiation and stress response of human mesenchymal stem cells exposed to alternating current electric fields Biomedical Engineering Online. ,vol. 10, pp. 9- 9 ,(2011) , 10.1186/1475-925X-10-9
Ashutosh Kumar Dubey, Shourya Dutta Gupta, Bikramjit Basu, Optimization of electrical stimulation parameters for enhanced cell proliferation on biomaterial surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B. ,vol. 98, pp. 18- 29 ,(2011) , 10.1002/JBM.B.31827
Akira Soda, Toshitaka Ikehara, Yohsuke Kinouchi, Kazuo Yoshizaki, Effect of exposure to an extremely low frequency-electromagnetic field on the cellular collagen with respect to signaling pathways in osteoblast-like cells The Journal of Medical Investigation. ,vol. 55, pp. 267- 278 ,(2008) , 10.2152/JMI.55.267