Does Bilateralism Promote Trade? Nineteenth Century Liberalization Revisited

作者: Olivier Accominotti , Olivier Accominotti , Marc Flandreau , Marc Flandreau

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Textbook accounts of the Anglo-French trade agreement 1860 argue that it heralded beginning a liberal trading order. This alleged success has much interest from policy point view: unlike modern GATT/WTO multilateral agreements, rested on bilateral negotiations. But, in reality, how great were its effects? With help new data international we provide empirical evidence. We find treaty and subsequent network Most Favoured Nation (MFN) agreements coincided with end period unilateral liberalization across world, did not contribute to expand at all. is contrary deeply rooted belief among economists economic historians. conclude that, popular wisdom, bilateralism promote 19th century.

参考文章(14)
Klaus Stocker, Währungen der Welt Gabler Verlag. pp. 41- 55 ,(2001) , 10.1007/978-3-322-89074-0_3
André Maurois, La vie de Disraëli Gallimard. ,(1927)
Michele Fratianni, Francesco Spinelli, A monetary history of Italy ,(1997)
N. F. R. CRAFTS, PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT IN NINETEENTH CENTURY EUROPE Oxford Economic Papers. ,vol. 36, pp. 438- 458 ,(1984) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.OEP.A041647
Gerhard Bondi, Deutschlands Aussenhandel : 1815-1870 Akademie-Verlag. ,(1958)
Phyllis Deane, B. R. Mitchell, Abstract of British Historical Statistics ,(1962)
Paul R. Gregory, Russian national income, 1885-1913 ,(1982)
Douglas A. Irwin, Douglas A. Irwin, New Estimates of the Average Tariff of the United States, 1790-1820 Social Science Research Network. ,(2003)
M.-S. Schulze, Patterns of growth and stagnation in the late nineteenth century Habsburg economy European Review of Economic History. ,vol. 4, pp. 311- 340 ,(2000) , 10.1017/S1361491600000095