Uncertainty in the deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): A sensitivity analysis to techno-economic parameter uncertainty

作者: B.S. Koelbl , M.A. van den Broek , B.J. van Ruijven , A.P.C. Faaij , D.P. van Vuuren

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2014.04.024

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Projections of the deployment Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies vary considerably. Cumulative emission reductions by CCS until 2100 in majority projections IPCC-TAR scenarios from 220 to 2200 GtCO2. This variation is a result uncertainty key determinants baselines different models, such as, technological development (IPCC Special Report on Dioxide Storage. Prepared Working Group III Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom New York). Technological parameters are power plant efficiency investment cost, capture transport cost storage capacity. study provides insights how uncertain this influences projections. For each parameter, ranges determined basis existing literature. systematically assessed for all these parameter global energy system model (TIMER). The results show that causes largest range cumulative CO2 captured electricity production (13–176 GtCO2 2050) scenario with medium fossil fuel price level. smallest, but still significant 65–91 GtCO2 cumulatively 2050, caused unit.

参考文章(57)
J DOOLEY, S KIM, J EDMONDS, S FRIEDMAN, M WISE, A first-order global geological CO2-storage potential supply curve and its application in a global integrated assessment model Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7#R##N#Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 5– September 2004, Vancouver, Canada. pp. 573- 581 ,(2005) , 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50058-6
Machteld van den Broek, Paul Veenendaal, Paul Koutstaal, Wim Turkenburg, André Faaij, Impact of international climate policies on CO2 capture and storage deployment: Illustrated in the Dutch energy system Energy Policy. ,vol. 39, pp. 2000- 2019 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2011.01.036
Jasper van Vliet, Maarten van den Berg, Michiel Schaeffer, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Michel den Elzen, Andries F. Hof, Angelica Mendoza Beltran, Malte Meinshausen, Copenhagen Accord Pledges imply higher costs for staying below 2°C warming Climatic Change. ,vol. 113, pp. 551- 561 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10584-012-0458-9
Joan M. Ogden, CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF OPTIMIZED FOSSIL ENERGY SYSTEMS WITH CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE University of California, Davis. Institute of Transportation Studies. Research report. ,(2004) , 10.2172/881856
Nathan Chandler Parker, Using Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Costs to Estimate Hydrogen Pipeline Costs University of California, Davis. Institute of Transportation Studies. Research report. ,(2004)
Machteld van den Broek, André Faaij, Wim Turkenburg, Planning for an electricity sector with carbon capture and storage International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 2, pp. 105- 129 ,(2008) , 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00113-2
Matthias Finkenrath, Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation Research Papers in Economics. ,(2011) , 10.1787/5KGGGN8WK05L-EN
Kay Damen, Martijn van Troost, André Faaij, Wim Turkenburg, A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. ,vol. 32, pp. 215- 246 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.PECS.2005.11.005