Planning for an electricity sector with carbon capture and storage

作者: Machteld van den Broek , André Faaij , Wim Turkenburg

DOI: 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00113-2

关键词:

摘要: Before energy companies will invest in power plants with CCS, appropriate climate policy should be place, a need for new must exist, CCS technology cost-effective, and CO2 transport infrastructure sinks available. In order to get more grip on planning, we carried out quantitative scenario study the electricity cogeneration sector Netherlands using bottom-up model generated MARKAL. We analysed strategies realise 15% 50% reduction of emissions respectively, 2020 2050 compared 1990 level. found that, if nuclear is excluded as mitigation option, can sufficiently cost-effective avoid 29 Mt per year Dutch (which half emission abatement necessary this year). identified following important factors planning. postponement strategy which reduced from 2020, abated at less than 30 €/t up 2020. A gradual 2.5% annually 2010, asks that makes expenditures possible 50 before 2015. Construction coal-fired without are preferably not built or, strategy, only limited extent. Finally, early planning required construction length around 450 km

参考文章(26)
Bert Metz, Ogunlade Davidson, Peter Bosch, Rutu Dave, Leo Meyer, None, Climate change 2007 - mitigation of climate change Cambridge University Press, New York, NY (United States). ,(2007)
D.W. Jones, G.S. Tolley, The Economic Future of Nuclear Power Americas Nuclear Energy Symposium (ANES 2004), Miami, FL (US), 10/03/2004--10/06/2004. ,(2004)
Emilio L. La Rovere, Hugh Pitcher, Joseph Alcamo, Hans-Holger Rogner, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Keywan Riahi, Sascha van Rooijen, Bert de Vries, William Pepper, Michael Schlesinger, Steven Smith, Tom Kram, Tsuneyuki Morita, Lynn Price, Alexei Sankovski, Gerald Davis, Robert Swart, Priyadarshi Shukla, Laurie Michaelis, Shunsuke Mori, Nadejda Victor, Joergen Fenhann, Amulf Griibler, Kermeth Gregory, Tae Y. Jung, Alexander Roehrl, Zhou Dadi, Stuart Gaffin, Special report on emissions scenarios (2000). pp. 612- ,(2000)
Kay Damen, Martijn van Troost, André Faaij, Wim Turkenburg, A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. ,vol. 32, pp. 215- 246 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.PECS.2005.11.005
Eric D. Larson, Wu Zongxin, Pat DeLaquil, Chen Wenying, Gao Pengfei, Future implications of China's energy-technology choices Energy Policy. ,vol. 31, pp. 1189- 1204 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00171-4
Peter Viebahn, Joachim Nitsch, Manfred Fischedick, Andrea Esken, Dietmar Schüwer, Nikolaus Supersberger, Ulrich Zuberbühler, Ottmar Edenhofer, Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economic, and ecological aspects in Germany International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 1, pp. 121- 133 ,(2007) , 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00024-2
M.W. Thring, World Energy Outlook Electronics and Power. ,vol. 23, pp. 329- ,(1977) , 10.1049/EP.1977.0180
M Junginger, A Faaij, W.C Turkenburg, Global experience curves for wind farms Energy Policy. ,vol. 33, pp. 133- 150 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00205-2
K DAMEN, A FAAIJ, W TURKENBURG, Pathways towards large-scale implementation of CO2 capture and storage: a case study for the Netherlands International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. ,vol. 3, pp. 217- 236 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.IJGGC.2008.09.005