The Ideology of Design: A Critical Appreciation of the Design Science Discourse in Information Systems and Wirtschaftsinformatik

作者: Bernd Carsten Stahl

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2336-3_6

关键词:

摘要: The discipline of information systems (IS) has been likened to a ‘fragmented adhocracy’ (Landry a. Banville 1992, p. 82). It emerged from number diverse ‘reference disciplines’ (Lee 1991; Lyytinen King 2004; Hirschheim Klein 2003) whose understanding research, truth and practice share little common ground. To some degree this may be good thing because it ensures that debates in IS continue lively interesting (Paul 2002). On the other hand, there is certain amount confusion among practitioners academics as what they are supposed allowed do. One consequence continuous struggle about criteria for evaluation research output evidenced by debate on rigour relevance Communications AIS.

参考文章(54)
Björn Niehaves, C Stahl Bernd, None, Criticality, epistemology and behaviour vs. Design –information systems research across different sets of paradigms european conference on information systems. pp. 50- 61 ,(2006)
Steve Sawyer, Hala Annabi, Methods as Theories: Evidence and Arguments for Theorizing on Software Development Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems. pp. 397- 411 ,(2006) , 10.1007/0-387-34588-4_26
Michael Freeden, Ideology: A Very Short Introduction ,(2003)
Jonathan Gosling, Henry Mintzberg, The Five Minds of a Manager Leadership Perspectives. ,vol. 81, pp. 41- 49 ,(2017) , 10.4324/9781315250601-5
Avgerou, McGrath, Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-technical change Management Information Systems Quarterly. ,vol. 31, pp. 295- 315 ,(2007) , 10.2307/25148792
Enid Mumford, Redesigning Human Systems ,(2003)