The Ten Basic Claims of Information Systems Research: An Approach to Interrogating Validity Claims in Scientific Argumentation

作者: Ojelanki Ngwenyama

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3446798

关键词:

摘要: The post-truth culture of corporate fraud, scientific misconduct and misinformation is challenging the legitimacy our democratic institutions. present environment public discourse suggest we need highly developed argumentation skills. If we, as scientists citizens, are to protect institutions, will vigorously interrogate claims truth knowledge. For such discourse, frameworks that signal values enable us uphold professional citizenship commitments science society. This essay offered a contribution development for open critical in IS discipline. framework approach interrogation outlined here rooted works two eminent scholars argumentation, Jurgen Habermas Stephen Toulmin. illustrated with an empirical analysis three papers published EJIS.

参考文章(88)
Ojelanki Ngwenyama, Logical Foundations of Social Science Research Advances in Research Methods for Information Systems Research. pp. 7- 13 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-9463-8_2
Stephen Toulmin, Rationality and Scientific Discovery PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. ,vol. 1972, pp. 387- 406 ,(1972) , 10.1007/978-94-010-2140-1_27
Paul R. Thagard, The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice The Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 75, pp. 76- 92 ,(1978) , 10.2307/2025686
Stephen Toulmin, Scientific Strategies and Historical Change Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 401- 414 ,(1974) , 10.1007/978-94-010-2126-5_23
Stephen Toulmin, Perspectives on activity theory: Knowledge as shared procedures Cambridge University Press. pp. 53- 64 ,(1999) , 10.1017/CBO9780511812774.005
Michael J. Zigmond, Beth A. Fischer, Beyond fabrication and plagiarism: The little murders of everyday science Science and Engineering Ethics. ,vol. 8, pp. 229- 234 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S11948-002-0024-3