An Objective Method to Prioritize Socio-Environmental Water Management Tradeoffs Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
作者： D. M. Martin , S. J. Powell , J. A. Webb , S. J. Nichols , N. L. Poff
DOI: 10.1002/RRA.3103
关键词:
摘要: Rivers provide many social and environmental services that benefit humanity. A critical role of water mangers is to prioritize allocation options trade off socio-economic hydro-ecological benefits in rivers. Methods for multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) a structured systematic manner researchers aid this process. In paper, we describe new MCDA method prioritizes large multi-dimensional sets tradeoffs support well-informed management The was developed based on an flows planning study the Goulburn-Broken River catchment, Victoria, Australia. combined simulation heuristic optimization procedure previously integrated into hydrological catchment network model. That process resulted set viable daily schedules traded long-term irrigation at outlet. We provided guidance procedures identify priority can be used stakeholder deliberations decision-making. Our included ordination cluster spread alternatives onto two-dimensional plane discover with similar criteria tradeoffs. geometric distance-based performed full identified clusters rank accordance minimizing distance ideal but non-feasible reference point space. This complements use elicitation when manager or other interaction not option objectivity desired. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(43)
Valerie Belton, Theodor J. Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Springer US. ,(2002) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
Sandra Postel, Brian D. Richter, Rivers for Life: Managing Water For People And Nature ,(2003)
S. Arnold, S. Attinger, K. Frank, P. Baxter, H. Possingham, A. Hildebrandt, Ecosystem Management Along Ephemeral Rivers: Trading Off Socio‐Economic Water Supply and Vegetation Conservation under Flood Regime Uncertainty River Research and Applications. ,vol. 32, pp. 219- 233 ,(2016) , 10.1002/RRA.2853
JA Webb, SC De Little, KA Miller, MJ Stewardson, ID Rutherfurd, AK Sharpe, L Patulny, NL Poff, None, A General Approach to Predicting Ecological Responses to Environmental Flows: Making Best Use of the Literature, Expert Knowledge, and Monitoring Data River Research and Applications. ,vol. 31, pp. 505- 514 ,(2015) , 10.1002/RRA.2832
Valerie Belton, Theodor J Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach ,(2001)
Francis Pantus, Jon Olley, Simon Linke, James Mugodo, Patrick Lea, Virgilio Hermoso, Prioritising catchment rehabilitation for multi objective management: an application from SE-Queensland, Australia. Ecological Modelling. ,vol. 316, pp. 168- 175 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2015.08.017
Brian D. Richter, David P. Braun, Michael A. Mendelson, Lawrence L. Master, Threats to Imperiled Freshwater Fauna Conservation Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. 1081- 1093 ,(1997) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1997.96236.X
Mika Marttunen, Raimo P. Hämäläinen, The Decision Analysis Interview Approach in the Collaborative Management of a Large Regulated Water Course Environmental Management. ,vol. 42, pp. 1026- 1042 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S00267-008-9200-9
Jonathan D. Herman, Harrison B. Zeff, Patrick M. Reed, Gregory W. Characklis, Beyond optimality: Multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty Water Resources Research. ,vol. 50, pp. 7692- 7713 ,(2014) , 10.1002/2014WR015338
STUART E. BUNN, ANGELA H. ARTHINGTON, Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management. ,vol. 30, pp. 492- 507 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00267-002-2737-0