Reframing the Classical Approach to Conceptual Change: Preconceptions, Misconceptions and Synthetic Models

作者: Stella Vosniadou

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_10

关键词:

摘要: We argue that science concepts are difficult to learn because they embedded in different explanatory frameworks from those currently accepted by science. Students mechanically employ the usual enrichment mechanisms add scientific information existing but incompatible knowledge structures, destroying their coherence and creating internal inconsistency misconceptions. explain many misconceptions be synthetic models resulting implicit assimilatory processes through which new is added onto stored base. Effective instruction needs deal with problem of conceptual change. To do so, curricula designed provide students all necessary restructure initial ontology, whilst also developing a more sophisticated epistemology understanding models. This type requires substantial sociocultural support.

参考文章(44)
Knowledge Acquisition: Enrichment or Conceptual Change? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 269- 304 ,(1991) , 10.4324/9781315807805-18
R. Baillargeon, A model of physical reasoning in infancy Advances in infancy research. ,vol. 9, pp. 305- 371 ,(1995)
A. Driver, R., Guesne, E., Tiberghien, Children's ideas in science ,(1985)
Stella Vosniadou, Re-framing the Conceptual Change Approach in Learning and Instruction Emerald Group Publishing Limited. ,(2007)
Carolyn K. Rovee-Collier, Lewis Paeff Lipsitt, Advances in infancy research ABLEX Publishing. ,(1981)
M. T. H. Chi, Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. pp. 129- 160 ,(1992)
Gale M. Sinatra, Gita Taasoobshirazi, Intentional Conceptual Change Routledge Handbooks Online. ,(2003) , 10.4324/9780203839010.CH13
Susan Carey, Conceptual Change in Childhood ,(1985)
Susan Carey, Elizabeth Spelke, Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. pp. 169- 200 ,(1994) , 10.1017/CBO9780511752902.008