Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
作者： Javier F. Magrina , Rosanne M. Kho , Amy L. Weaver , Regina P. Montero , Paul M. Magtibay
DOI: 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2008.01.011
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Objective Comparison of perioperative results patients undergoing radical hysterectomy by robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy. Study design Prospective analysis 27 robotic between April 2003 September 2006. was made with operated laparoscopy laparotomy matched age, BMI, site type malignancy, FIGO staging, hysterectomy. Results The mean operating times for robotic, were 189.6, 220.4, 166.8 min, respectively; the blood loss 133.1, 208.4, 443.6 ml, rate 0.7, 0.9, 2.6 ml/min, number removed lymph nodes 25.9, 27.7, length hospital stay 1.7, 2.4, 3.6 days, respectively. There no significant differences in intra- or postoperative complications among three groups, fistula formation any patient conversions laparoscopic groups. At a follow up 31.1 months, none cervical cancer has experienced recurrence. Conclusion Laparoscopy robotics are preferable to requiring Operating similar, significantly shorter as compared laparoscopy. Blood loss, similar reduced
elsevier.com
gynecologiconcology-online.net
sci-hub.se 参考文章(20)
Richard Sarle, Ashutosh Tewari, Alok Shrivastava, James Peabody, Mani Menon, None, Surgical Robotics and Laparoscopic Training Drills Journal of Endourology. ,vol. 18, pp. 63- 67 ,(2004) , 10.1089/089277904322836703
M. STEVEN PIVER, FELIX RUTLEDGE, JULIAN P. SMITH, Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 44, pp. 265- 272 ,(1975) , 10.1097/00006254-197503000-00027
JAVIER F. MAGRINA, MARTHA A. GOODRICH, AMY L. WEAVER, KARL C. PODRATZ, Modified Radical Hysterectomy: Morbidity and Mortality Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 59, pp. 277- 282 ,(1995) , 10.1006/GYNO.1995.0022
Javier F. Magrina, Nina F. Mutone, Amy L. Weaver, Paul M. Magtibay, R.Stuart Fowler, Jeffrey L. Cornella, Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for endometrial cancer: Morbidity and survival American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 181, pp. 376- 381 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70565-X
Richard E. Symmonds, Some surgical aspects of gynecologic cancer Cancer. ,vol. 36, pp. 649- 660 ,(1975) , 10.1002/1097-0142(197508)36:2+<649::AID-CNCR2820360807>3.0.CO;2-I
Michael Frumovitz, Ricardo dos Reis, Charlotte C. Sun, Michael R. Milam, Michael W. Bevers, Jubilee Brown, Brian M. Slomovitz, Pedro T. Ramirez, Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 110, pp. 96- 102 ,(2007) , 10.1097/01.AOG.0000268798.75353.04
K. Zakashansky, L. Chuang, H. Gretz, N. P. Nagarsheth, J. Rahaman, F. R. Nezhat, A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. ,vol. 17, pp. 1075- 1082 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1525-1438.2007.00921.X
Javier F. Magrina, Martha A. Goodrich, Thomas K. Lidner, Amy L. Weaver, Jeffrey L. Cornella, Karl C. Podratz, Modified Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early Squamous Cervical Cancer Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 72, pp. 183- 186 ,(1999) , 10.1006/GYNO.1998.5245
VIPUL R. PATEL, A.S. TULLY, R. HOLMES, J. LINDSAY, ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN THE COMMUNITY SETTING—THE LEARNING CURVE AND BEYOND: INITIAL 200 CASES The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 174, pp. 269- 272 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.JU.0000162082.12962.40
K. Moorthy, Y. Munz, A. Dosis, J. Hernandez, S. Martin, F. Bello, T. Rockall, A. Darzi, Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 18, pp. 790- 795 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S00464-003-8922-2