Role of Biochemical Investigations and Diagnostic Tools in Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions

作者: Vishal R Tandon

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8487.4907

关键词:

摘要: Aim of Study: To evaluate the role biochemical investigations (BI) and diagnostic tools (DT) in ADR detection. Materials Methods: An observational prospective cross-sectional study was done using suspected data collection form. Results: A total 2381 related events were recorded two years. Total number/percentage abnormalities (BA) detection rate 14.57% DT 1.091% contrast to 84.33% with clinical presentation. Maximum cases inward patients (87.13%), 67.02% by active surveillance. at one point & on follow up 56.31% Vs 46.38%. ECG, endoscopy, X-ray 0.57%, 0.22%, 0.22% CT scan, MRI, DEXA USG biopsy 0.04% each. ADRs severe/serious, latent Type-A nature. Anemia (4.6%), followed liver dysfunction (2.8%), renal dysfunction, electrolyte imbalance, hyperglycemia (1.1% each), abnormal coagulation profile (1%), decrease platelet count (0.8%), hypoglycemia (0.7%) most common BAs. Anti retroviral drugs (ART), tirofiban methotrexate accounted for anemia, ART anti tubercular insulin hypoglycemia, tirofiban, paclitaxel, capecipabine ifosfamide thrombocytopenia, hematuria enoxaparin dyslipidemia ADRs. Conclusion: BI can play very important detection.

参考文章(24)
Santosh KC, Pramote Tragulpiankit, I. Ralph Edwards, Sarun Gorsanan, Knowledge about adverse drug reactions reporting among healthcare professionals in Nepal. The international journal of risk and safety in medicine. ,vol. 25, pp. 1- 16 ,(2013) , 10.3233/JRS-120578
Maria Teresa Herdeiro, Inês Ribeiro-Vaz, Mónica Ferreira, Jorge Polónia, Amílcar Falcão, Adolfo Figueiras, Workshop- and Telephone-Based Interventions to Improve Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Drug Safety. ,vol. 35, pp. 655- 665 ,(2012) , 10.1007/BF03261962
Lee Hilary Goldstein, Maya Berlin, Walid Saliba, Mazen Elias, Matitiyahu Berkovitch, Founding an adverse drug reaction (ADR) network: A method for improving doctors spontaneous ADR reporting in a general hospital The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 53, pp. 1220- 1225 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JCPH.149
B.N. Kumar, K. Nayak, H. Singh, N. Dulhani, P. Singh, P. Tewari, A pharmacovigilance study in medicine department of tertiary care hospital in chhattisgarh (jagdalpur), India. Journal of Young Pharmacists. ,vol. 2, pp. 95- 100 ,(2010) , 10.4103/0975-1483.62222
Jackie Inch, Margaret C Watson, Stella Anakwe-Umeh, Yellow Card Study Collaboration, Patient versus healthcare professional spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review. Drug Safety. ,vol. 35, pp. 807- 818 ,(2012) , 10.2165/11631650-000000000-00000
Joanna E. Klopotowska, , Peter C. Wierenga, Susanne M. Smorenburg, Clementine C. M. Stuijt, Lambertus Arisz, Paul F. M. Kuks, Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf, Loraine Lie-A-Huen, Sophia E. de Rooij, Recognition of adverse drug events in older hospitalized medical patients European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 69, pp. 75- 85 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00228-012-1316-4
Lorna Hazell, Saad A W Shakir, Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review. Drug Safety. ,vol. 29, pp. 385- 396 ,(2006) , 10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003
Harmeet S. Rehan, Deepti Chopra, Ravinder K. Sah, Ritu Mishra, Adverse drug reactions: trends in a tertiary care hospital. Current Drug Safety. ,vol. 7, pp. 384- 388 ,(2012) , 10.2174/157488612805076598