The Use of Cognitive Taxonomies in Licensure and Certification Test Development: Reasonable or Customary?.
作者： Gregory J. Cizek , Lynn C. Webb , John C. Kalohn
DOI: 10.1177/016327879501800106
关键词:
摘要: This research addressed the functioning of a cognitive taxonomy within test specifications health sciences certification examination. The investigated whether items written purposefully to assess higher order processes provided evidence assessing differing levels processing. Overall, results yielded no support for continuing use hierarchical classification dimension specifications. Implications researchfor development, construction, item writing, and score reporting are presented. Limitations suggestionsforfuture provided.
sagepub.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(7)
Robert Wood, Multiple choice: A state of the art report Evaluation in Education. International Progress. ,vol. 1, pp. 191- 280 ,(1977) , 10.1016/0145-9228(77)90007-3
Henry F. Kaiser, An index of factorial simplicity Psychometrika. ,vol. 39, pp. 31- 36 ,(1974) , 10.1007/BF02291575
Sally Hixon Cavanaugh, Response to a Legal Challenge Five Steps to Defensible Credentialing Examinations Evaluation & the Health Professions. ,vol. 14, pp. 13- 40 ,(1991) , 10.1177/016327879101400102
George F. Madaus, Elinor M. Woods, Ronald L. Nuttall, A Causal Model Analysis of Bloom’s Taxonomy American Educational Research Journal. ,vol. 10, pp. 253- 262 ,(1973) , 10.3102/00028312010004253
GM Seddon, The Properties of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for the Cognitive Domain Review of Educational Research. ,vol. 48, pp. 303- 323 ,(1978) , 10.3102/00346543048002303
David R. Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Max D. Engelhart, Walker H. Hill, Edward J. Furst, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain McKay,. ,(1956)