作者: Asha K. Jitendra , Andria Deatline-Buchman , Edward Sczesniak
DOI: 10.1177/073724770503000205
关键词:
摘要: We previously conducted a curriculum analysis of third-grade mathematics textbooks aimed at investigating the extent to which teaching recommended methods for problem solving adhered 2000 National Council Teachers Mathematics (NCTM) Standards and instructional design criteria. In this article, we extend previous findings by comparing presented in same published after NCTM that older editions before were effect. Results indicated changes varied with regard meeting different Standards. However, results criteria more consistent changes, favoring textbook series 2000. Additional implications practice are discussed.