Investigating the ability of multiparametric MRI to exclude significant prostate cancer prior to transperineal biopsy

作者: Eva M Serrao , Tristan Barrett , Karan Wadhwa , Deepak Parashar , Julia Frey

DOI: 10.5489/CUAJ.2895

关键词:

摘要: Introduction: We characterized false negative prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reporting by using histology derived from MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided transperineal (MTTP) fusion biopsies. Methods: In total, 148 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Men underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), reported a consultant/attending radiologist in line with European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) standards. MTTP biopsy the lesions was performed according to Ginsburg recommendations. Cases an MRI-histology mismatch identified and second read experienced radiologist. A third review direct comparison determine true miss MRI-occult cancer. Statistical analysis McNemar’s test. Results: False 29 examinations (19.6%), total 46 lesions. Most (21/46) located anterior sectors prostate. The led significant decrease false-negative 7/29 further studies as positive on patientby- patient basis (24.1% studies, p = 0.016) 11/46 (23.9%; 0.001). Of these, 30 following first 23 after considered cancer University College London criteria. However, histology, most occult. Conclusion: demonstrate that can fail detect clinically relevant Improved results achieved but despite this, number remain MRI-occult. Further advances are required reduce results.

参考文章(38)
Jérémie Haffner, Laurent Lemaitre, Philippe Puech, Georges‐Pascal Haber, Xavier Leroy, J Stephen Jones, Arnauld Villers, None, Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJUI. ,vol. 108, ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2011.10112.X
T. Barrett, B. Turkbey, P.L. Choyke, PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know. Clinical Radiology. ,vol. 70, pp. 1165- 1176 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.CRAD.2015.06.093
J. Graham, P. Kirkbride, K. Cann, E. Hasler, M. Prettyjohns, Prostate cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance BMJ. ,vol. 348, ,(2014) , 10.1136/BMJ.F7524
Nicolas B. Delongchamps, Gustavo de la Roza, Richard Jones, Mary Jumbelic, Gabriel P. Haas, Saturation biopsies on autopsied prostates for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer. BJUI. ,vol. 103, pp. 49- 54 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2008.07900.X
Oguz Akin, Evis Sala, Chaya S Moskowitz, Kentaro Kuroiwa, Nicole M Ishill, Darko Pucar, Peter T Scardino, Hedvig Hricak, None, Transition Zone Prostate Cancers: Features, Detection, Localization, and Staging at Endorectal MR Imaging Radiology. ,vol. 239, pp. 784- 792 ,(2006) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2392050949
Akihiro Tanimoto, Jun Nakashima, Hidaka Kohno, Hiroshi Shinmoto, Sachio Kuribayashi, Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 25, pp. 146- 152 ,(2007) , 10.1002/JMRI.20793
Oguz Akin, Christopher C. Riedl, Nicole M. Ishill, Chaya S. Moskowitz, Jingbo Zhang, Hedvig Hricak, Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer. European Radiology. ,vol. 20, pp. 995- 1002 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S00330-009-1625-X
PRODROMOS G. BORBOROGLU, STEWART W. COMER, ROBERT. H. RIFFENBURGH, CHRISTOPHER L. AMLING, EXTENSIVE REPEAT TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS BENIGN SEXTANT BIOPSIES The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 163, pp. 158- 162 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67994-3
Hashim Uddin Ahmed, Yipeng Hu, Tim Carter, Nimalan Arumainayagam, Emilie Lecornet, Alex Freeman, David Hawkes, Dean C. Barratt, Mark Emberton, Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy Journal of Urology. ,vol. 186, pp. 458- 464 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2011.03.147
Dwayne T. S. Chang, Benjamin Challacombe, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Transperineal biopsy of the prostate—is this the future? Nature Reviews Urology. ,vol. 10, pp. 690- 702 ,(2013) , 10.1038/NRUROL.2013.195