Application of Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Method to Determine Prosthetic Mitral Valve Area

作者: Muzaffer Degertekin , Murat Gençbay , Yelda Başaran , İbrahim Duran , Hüseyın Yilmaz

DOI: 10.1016/S0894-7317(98)70157-9

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Background. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of orifice area determination prosthetic valve (Biocor) by using proximal isovelocity surface method (PISA). Thirty-two patients (26 women, 6 men; mean age 44 ± 8.1 years) were studied. Eleven in normal sinus rhythm and rest atrial fibrillation. Associated valvular lesions mild aortic regurgitation 12 moderate tricuspid 19 patients. Sizes valves 27 to 31, implantation duration was 4 8 years. Methods Results. We analyzed flow convergence zone with concept a hemispheric model. Mitral (MVA) calculation formulated MVA=2πr 2 × Va/Vm (Vm/Vm – Va), where Vm is maximal mitral velocity Vm/Vm Va correction factor account for flattening isotachs near orifice. MVA calculations PISA compared pressure half-time (PHT), continuity equation (CONT), color (CFA) methods. areas 2.17 0.17 cm , 2.22 0.21 2.19 0.22 2.16 PISA, CFA, PHT, CONT methods, respectively. Values comparison measurements different methods vs r = .86; .77; CONT, .89. Conclusions. The gives reliable estimates large orifices such as valves. Although best correlation seen method, results study also confirmed that can be applied reasonable accuracy. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998;11:1056-63.)

参考文章(23)
Catherine M. Otto, The practice of clinical echocardiography : Saunders/Elsevier,. ,(2007)
Mohsin Alam, Howard S Rosman, Jeffrey B Lakier, Stephen Kemp, Fareed Khaja, Kathryn Hautamaki, Donald J Magilligan Jr, Paul D Stein, None, Doppler and echocardiographic features of normal and dysfunctioning bioprosthetic valves. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 10, pp. 851- 858 ,(1987) , 10.1016/S0735-1097(87)80280-2
J D Thomas, G T Wilkins, C Y Choong, V M Abascal, I F Palacios, P C Block, A E Weyman, Inaccuracy of mitral pressure half-time immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy. Dependence on transmitral gradient and left atrial and ventricular compliance. Circulation. ,vol. 78, pp. 980- 993 ,(1988) , 10.1161/01.CIR.78.4.980
Takehiko Kawhara, Masakazu Yamagishi, Hiromi Seo, Mayumi Mitani, Satoshi Nakatani, Shintaro Beppu, Seiki Nagata, Kunio Miyatake, Application of Doppler color flow imaging to determine valve area in mitral stenosis Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 18, pp. 85- 92 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80223-2
Shuping Ge, Michael Jones, Takahiro Shiota, Izumi Yamada, Curt G. DeGroff, Dag E. Teien, Antonio M. Baptista, David J. Sahn, Quantification of mitral flow by Doppler color flow mapping. Journal of The American Society of Echocardiography. ,vol. 9, pp. 700- 709 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0894-7317(96)90067-X
Jean G. Dumesnil, George N Honos, Michel Lemieux, Jocelyn Beauchemin, Validation and applications of mitral prosthetic valvular areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography The American Journal of Cardiology. ,vol. 65, pp. 1443- 1448 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91352-7
Dennis Tighe, Robert D. Rifkin, Kathleen Harper, Comparison of proximal isovelocity surface area method with pressure half-time and planimetry in evaluation of mitral stenosis Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 26, pp. 458- 465 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0735-1097(95)80023-A
J. B CHAMBERS, T. COCHRANE, M. M BLACK, G. JACKSON, The effect of flow on Doppler estimates of bioprosthetic mitral valve function in vitro. Cardiovascular Research. ,vol. 23, pp. 1007- 1014 ,(1989) , 10.1093/CVR/23.12.1007
L Rodriguez, J D Thomas, V Monterroso, A E Weyman, P Harrigan, L N Mueller, R A Levine, Validation of the proximal flow convergence method. Calculation of orifice area in patients with mitral stenosis. Circulation. ,vol. 88, pp. 1157- 1165 ,(1993) , 10.1161/01.CIR.88.3.1157