The effect of branch length variation on the selection of models of molecular evolution.

作者: David Posada

DOI: 10.1007/S002390010173

关键词:

摘要: Models of sequence evolution play an important role in molecular evolutionary studies. The use inappropriate models may bias the results analysis and lead to erroneous conclusions. Several procedures for selecting best-fit model data at hand have been proposed, like likelihood ratio test (LRT) Akaike (AIC) Bayesian (BIC) information criteria. relative performance these model-selecting algorithms has not yet studied under a range different trees. In this study, influence branch length variation upon selection is characterized. This done by simulating alignments known nucleotide substitution, recording how often true recovered model-fitting strategies. Results study agree with previous simulations suggest that reasonably accurate. However, methods showed distinct levels accuracy. Some LRT approaches better than AIC or BIC Within LRTs, affected complexity initial selected comparisons, only slightly order which parameters are added model. A specific hierarchy starts from simple evolution, performed overall other possible hierarchies, BIC.

参考文章(62)
Keith A. Crandall, The evolution of HIV Johns Hopkins University Press. ,(1999)
THOMAS H. JUKES, CHARLES R. CANTOR, CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules Mammalian Protein Metabolism#R##N#Volume III. pp. 21- 132 ,(1969) , 10.1016/B978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7
S. Tavare, Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences Some mathematical questions in biology / DNA sequence analysis edited by Robert M. Miura. ,(1986)
Pavel Morozov, Francisco José Ayala, Gary Churchill, Tatyana Sitnikova, Andrey Rzhetsky, A new method for characterizing replacement rate variation in molecular sequences. Application of the Fourier and wavelet models to Drosophila and mammalian proteins. Genetics. ,vol. 154, pp. 381- 395 ,(2000) , 10.1093/GENETICS/154.1.381
J. Felsenstein, Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading Systematic Biology. ,vol. 27, pp. 401- 410 ,(1978) , 10.1093/SYSBIO/27.4.401
J. P. Huelsenbeck, D. M. Hillis, Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case Systematic Biology. ,vol. 42, pp. 247- 264 ,(1993) , 10.1093/SYSBIO/42.3.247
B. S. Gaut, P. O. Lewis, Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case. Molecular Biology and Evolution. ,vol. 12, pp. 152- 162 ,(1995) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.MOLBEV.A040183