Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: the future?

作者: Tarik Sammour , George J. Chang

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07773-8

关键词:

摘要: Robotic technology currently offers some technical advantages in pelvic dissection compared with competing minimally invasive techniques, and adoption for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer is rapidly increasing worldwide. While there are early data demonstrating modest improvement patient outcomes, benefits terms long-term oncological as well potential improvements surgeon-centered outcomes such fatigue repetitive stress injury actively being investigated. Rapid innovation, impending release several new robotic platforms, likely to further expand application these technologies, improve on current limitations, reduce capital consumable costs. It imperative that, develops increases further, clinician research led programs drive safe implementation a patient-first approach.

参考文章(36)
Michael I. Hanzly, Tareq Al-Tartir, Syed Johar Raza, Atif Khan, Mohammad Manan Durrani, Thomas Fiorica, Phillip Ginsberg, James L. Mohler, Boris Kuvshinoff, Khurshid A. Guru, Simulation-Based Training in Robot-Assisted Surgery: Current Evidence of Value and Potential Trends for the Future Current Urology Reports. ,vol. 16, pp. 41- ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11934-015-0508-8
David R. Yates, Christophe Vaessen, Morgan Roupret, From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot‐assisted surgery in urology BJUI. ,vol. 108, pp. 1708- 1713 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2011.10576.X
Andrew R. L. Stevenson, Michael J. Solomon, John W. Lumley, Peter Hewett, Andrew D. Clouston, Val J. Gebski, Lucy Davies, Kate Wilson, Wendy Hague, John Simes, Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer JAMA. ,vol. 314, pp. 1356- 1363 ,(2015) , 10.1001/JAMA.2015.12009
Marko Simunovic, Nancy N. Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Ning Liu, Margherita Cadeddu, David Urbach, Uptake and Patient Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery in a Publicly Funded System and Following Financial Incentives Annals of Surgical Oncology. ,vol. 20, pp. 3740- 3746 ,(2013) , 10.1245/S10434-013-3123-2
H. Jaap Bonjer, Charlotte L. Deijen, Gabor A. Abis, Miguel A. Cuesta, Martijn H.G.M. van der Pas, Elly S.M. de Lange-de Klerk, Antonio M. Lacy, Willem A. Bemelman, John Andersson, Eva Angenete, Jacob Rosenberg, Alois Fuerst, Eva Haglind, A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 372, pp. 1324- 1332 ,(2015) , 10.1056/NEJMOA1414882
F. Pugin, P. Bucher, P. Morel, History of robotic surgery: from AESOP® and ZEUS® to da Vinci®. Journal of Visceral Surgery. ,vol. 148, ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JVISCSURG.2011.04.007
Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim, Dae Ro Lim, Hyuk Hur, Byung So Min, Kang Young Lee, Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. ,vol. 20, pp. 2625- 2632 ,(2013) , 10.1245/S10434-013-2895-8
Se-Jin Baek, Seon-Hahn Kim, Jae-Sung Cho, Jae-Won Shin, Jin Kim, Robotic versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Cost Analysis from A Single Institute in Korea World Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 36, pp. 2722- 2729 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00268-012-1728-4
Se Jin Baek, Chang Hee Kim, Min Soo Cho, Sung Uk Bae, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim, Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 29, pp. 1419- 1424 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S00464-014-3818-X
A. Pigazzi, J. D. I. Ellenhorn, G. H. Ballantyne, I. B. Paz, Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 20, pp. 1521- 1525 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S00464-005-0855-5