Implementing high seas biodiversity conservation: global geopolitical considerations

作者: Stuart Kaye

DOI: 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2003.09.001

关键词:

摘要: Abstract This article will consider the broad geopolitical considerations in measures towards biodiversity conservation and governance of high seas areas. Traditionally, international law has provided for jurisdiction based upon flag State areas, States have shown themselves reluctant to depart from this model. International organisations with responsibility living resource management proven, many cases, be limited utility sustainable resources. traditional norm jurisdiction, while still dominant, is now being joined by use supra-national context regional fisheries under United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement. Part reason effectiveness focus individual on national interest, which may undermine cooperation. The paper explores what mechanisms exist within that would permit a more effective conservation, how these used combat erosion interests. Recognition factors cooperation active efforts address matters, prove essential establishment successful regime

参考文章(14)
Myron H. Nordquist (Hrsg.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, A Commentary Verfassung in Recht und Übersee. ,vol. 29, pp. 258- 260 ,(1996) , 10.5771/0506-7286-1996-2-258
Stuart B. Kaye, International Fisheries Management ,(2000)
Jeremy Faith, Enforcement of Fishing Regulations in International Waters: Piracy or Protection, Is Gunboat Diplomacy the Only Means Left Loyola of Los Angeles international and comparative law review. ,vol. 19, pp. 199- ,(1996)
Barbara Kwiatkowska, Creeping jurisdiction beyond 200 miles in the light of the 1982 law of the sea convention and state practice Ocean Development and International Law. ,vol. 22, pp. 153- 187 ,(1991) , 10.1080/00908329109545954
Shigeru Oda, Edward W. Allen, International control of sea resources ,(1989)