Utility of untimed single urine protein/creatinine ratio as a substitute for 24-h proteinuria for assessment of proteinuria in systemic lupus erythematosus

作者: Jorge Medina-Rosas , Dafna D. Gladman , Jiandong Su , Arthy Sabapathy , Murray B. Urowitz

DOI: 10.1186/S13075-015-0808-X

关键词:

摘要: In this study, we determined: (1) the utility of an untimed sample urine protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) as a screening test for proteinuria, (2) its ability to accurately measure and (3) cutoff values PCR predicting protein content in 24-h collection sample (24hP) 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 g/day. Analysis was performed on data from single lupus cohort (2008–2014). Proteinuria measured 24hP with PCR. On basis 24hP, samples were divided into 4 groups: group 1, <0.5 g/day; 2, 0.5–0.99 g/day; 3, 1–1.99 g/day; 4, ≥2 g/day. To determine validity Pearson correlation coefficient determined normal (<0.05 g/mmol) (<0.5 g/day). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative (NPV) calculated. level addition between PCR, agreement by intraclass coefficient, concordance Bland-Altman plot 24hP/24hC best cutoffs 2.0 g/day receiver operating characteristic curve. well (n = 552) 0.29 (p < 0.0001). sensitivity and specificity against 91 % 83 %, respectively. PPV 82.5 %, NPV 91.4 %. all (n = 1233) high, but low moderate groups 3, and 4. appropriate poor 0.08, 0.16, 0.35 g/mmol, can be used predict 0.5 g/day is 0.08 g/mmol (800 mg/g). accurate proteinuria should gold standard test, 24hP.

参考文章(42)
Jin Kyun Park, Eun Bong Lee, Yeong Wook Song, In Ah Choi, Eun Young Lee, Random spot urine protein to creatinine ratio is a reliable measure of proteinuria in lupus nephritis in Koreans. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. ,vol. 31, pp. 584- 588 ,(2013)
Mavuto Mukaka, Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi. ,vol. 24, pp. 69- 71 ,(2012) , 10.4314/MMJ.V24I3
Ayman M Wahbeh, Mohammad H Ewais, Mahamed E Elsharif, None, Comparison of 24-hour urinary protein and protein-to-creatinine ratio in the assessment of proteinuria Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation. ,vol. 20, pp. 443- 447 ,(2009)
Donald W. Cockcroft, Henry Gault, Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine Nephron. ,vol. 16, pp. 31- 41 ,(1976) , 10.1159/000180580
S. C. M. MITCHELL, T. A. SHELDON, A. B. SHAW, Quantification of Proteinuria: A Re-evaluation of the Protein/Creatinine Ratio for Elderly Subjects Age and Ageing. ,vol. 22, pp. 443- 449 ,(1993) , 10.1093/AGEING/22.6.443
Brad H Rovin, Richard Furie, Kevin Latinis, R John Looney, Fernando C Fervenza, Jorge Sanchez‐Guerrero, Romeo Maciuca, David Zhang, Jay P Garg, Paul Brunetta, Gerald Appel, LUNAR Investigator Group, None, Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis: The lupus nephritis assessment with rituximab study† Arthritis & Rheumatism. ,vol. 64, pp. 1215- 1226 ,(2012) , 10.1002/ART.34359
Mansour Salesi, Mansoor Karimifar, Ziba Farajzadegan, Kamal Esalatmanesh, Shahrzad Khosravi, Parvin Fallahi, Mahmood Akbarian, The protein–creatinine ratio in spot morning urine samples and 24-h urinary protein excretion in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus Rheumatology International. ,vol. 29, pp. 503- 507 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S00296-008-0742-1
Antoine Flahault, Michel Cadilhac, Guy Thomas, Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 58, pp. 859- 862 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2004.12.009