Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.

作者: Joshua J. Fenton , Stephen H. Taplin , Patricia A. Carney , Linn Abraham , Edward A. Sickles

DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA066099

关键词:

摘要: BACKGROUND Computer-aided detection identifies suspicious findings on mammograms to assist radiologists. Since the Food and Drug Administration approved technology in 1998, it has been disseminated into practice, but its effect accuracy of interpretation is unclear. METHODS We determined association between use computer-aided at mammography facilities performance screening from 1998 through 2002 43 three states. had complete data for 222,135 women (a total 429,345 mammograms), including 2351 who received a diagnosis breast cancer within 1 year after screening. calculated specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value with without detection, as well rates biopsy breast-cancer overall accuracy, measured area under receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS Seven (16%) implemented during study period. Diagnostic specificity decreased 90.2% before implementation 87.2% (P<0.001), 4.1% 3.2% (P=0.01), rate increased by 19.7% (P<0.001). The increase sensitivity 80.4% 84.0% was not significant (P=0.32). change cancer-detection (including invasive cancers ductal carcinomas situ) (4.15 cases per 1000 4.20 implementation, P=0.90). Analyses all showed that associated significantly lower than nonuse (area ROC curve, 0.871 vs. 0.919; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS reduced mammograms. clearly improved cancer.

参考文章(36)
Wendie A. Berg, Cristina Campassi, Patricia Langenberg, Mary J. Sexton, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 174, pp. 1769- 1777 ,(2000) , 10.2214/AJR.174.6.1741769
Kunio Doi, Maryellen L. Giger, Robert M. Nishikawa, Robert A. Schmidt, Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Cancer on Mammograms. Breast Cancer. ,vol. 4, pp. 228- 233 ,(1997) , 10.1007/BF02966511
Melinda E. Sanders, Peggy A. Schuyler, William D. Dupont, David L. Page, The natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up Cancer. ,vol. 103, pp. 2481- 2484 ,(2005) , 10.1002/CNCR.21069
Anna N Angelos Tosteson, Colin B Begg, None, A General Regression Methodology for ROC Curve Estimation Medical Decision Making. ,vol. 8, pp. 204- 215 ,(1988) , 10.1177/0272989X8800800309
Karla Kerlikowske, Peter Salzmann, Kathryn A. Phillips, Jane A. Cauley, Steve R. Cummings, Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness. JAMA. ,vol. 282, pp. 2156- 2163 ,(1999) , 10.1001/JAMA.282.22.2156
Robyn L. Birdwell, Parul Bandodkar, Debra M. Ikeda, Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology. ,vol. 236, pp. 451- 457 ,(2005) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2362040864
Heang-Ping Chan, Kunio Doi, Simranjit Galhotra, Carl J. Vyborny, Heber MacMahon, Peter M. Jokich, Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography Medical Physics. ,vol. 14, pp. 538- 548 ,(1987) , 10.1118/1.596065
W. E. Barlow, C. Chi, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, C. D'Orsi, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, J. G. Elmore, Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 96, pp. 1840- 1850 ,(2004) , 10.1093/JNCI/DJH333
R. James Brenner, Michael J. Ulissey, Ronald M. Wilt, Computer-aided detection as evidence in the courtroom: potential implications of an appellate court's ruling. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 186, pp. 48- 51 ,(2006) , 10.2214/AJR.05.0215
RACHEL F. BREM, JOELLE M. SCHOONJANS, Radiologist Detection of Microcalcifications With and Without Computer-Aided Detection: A Comparative Study Clinical Radiology. ,vol. 56, pp. 150- 154 ,(2001) , 10.1053/CRAD.2000.0592