Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting.

作者: Robyn L. Birdwell , Parul Bandodkar , Debra M. Ikeda

DOI: 10.1148/RADIOL.2362040864

关键词:

摘要: PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on screening mammogram interpretation in an academic medical center to determine if outcome is different than that previously reported for community practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was granted, and informed consent waived. During a 19-month period, 8682 women (median age, 54 years; range, 33–95 years) underwent mammography. Each interpreted by one seven radiologists, followed immediate re-evaluation with CAD information. recalled case classified as follows: radiologist perceived finding marked it, did not mark or prompted perceive recall patient. Lesion type also recorded. Recalled patients were tracked biopsy recommendation rates, positive predictive value (PPV) biopsy, can...

参考文章(14)
Sickles Ea, Quality assurance. How to audit your own mammography practice. Radiologic Clinics of North America. ,vol. 30, pp. 265- 275 ,(1992)
Dave P. Miller, Emphasis on CIs when P values are not appropriate. Radiology. ,vol. 224, pp. 932- 933 ,(2002) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2243012120
J A Harvey, L L Fajardo, C A Innis, Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 161, pp. 1167- 1172 ,(1993) , 10.2214/AJR.161.6.8249720
Linda J. Warren Burhenne, Susan A. Wood, Carl J. D'Orsi, Stephen A. Feig, Daniel B. Kopans, Kathryn F. O'Shaughnessy, Edward A. Sickles, Laszlo Tabar, Carl J. Vyborny, Ronald A. Castellino, Potential Contribution of Computer-aided Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening Mammography Radiology. ,vol. 215, pp. 554- 562 ,(2000) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.215.2.R00MA15554
S. A. Feig, E. A. Sickles, W. P. Evans, M. N. Linver, Re: Changes in Breast Cancer Detection and Mammography Recall Rates After the Introduction of a Computer-Aided Detection System Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 96, pp. 1260- 1261 ,(2004) , 10.1093/JNCI/DJH257
Craig A. Beam, Daniel C. Sullivan, Peter M. Layde, Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography Academic Radiology. ,vol. 3, pp. 891- 897 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80296-0
E L Thurfjell, K A Lernevall, A A Taube, Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology. ,vol. 191, pp. 241- 244 ,(1994) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.191.1.8134580