Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks

作者: Alexia Galati , Marios N. Avraamides

DOI: 10.3389/FNHUM.2013.00618

关键词:

摘要: Research on spatial perspective-taking often focuses the cognitive processes of isolated individuals as they adopt or maintain imagined perspectives. Collaborative studies typically examine speakers’ linguistic choices, while overlooking their underlying and representations. We review evidence from two collaborative experiments that contribution social representational cues to perspective choices in both language organization memory. Across experiments, speakers organized memory representations according convergence various cues. When layouts were randomly configured did not afford intrinsic cues, encoded partner’s viewpoint memory, if available, but use it an organizing direction. On other hand, when layout afforded structure, memories person-centered reinforced by layout’s structure. Similarly, descriptions, considered multiple whether available a priori at interaction. They used partner-centered expressions more frequently (e.g., “to your right”) was misaligned small offset coincided with Conversely, egocentric own structure partner computationally difficult, oblique offset. Based these findings we advocate for framework flexible perspective-taking: people weigh (including ones) make attributions about relative difficulty each partner, adapt behavior minimize collective effort. This is specialized reasoning instead emerges same principles memory-depended govern non-spatial tasks.

参考文章(50)
Timothy P. McNamara, How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory international conference spatial cognition. pp. 174- 191 ,(2003) , 10.1007/3-540-45004-1_11
Herbert H. Clark, Susan E. Brennan, GROUNDING IN COMMUNICATION Perspectives on Socially shared cognition. pp. 127- 149 ,(1991) , 10.1037/10096-006
Alexia Galati, Christina Michael, Catherine Mello, Nathan M. Greenauer, Marios N. Avraamides, The conversational partner’s perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions Journal of Memory and Language. ,vol. 68, pp. 140- 159 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JML.2012.10.001
Scott D. Mainwaring, Barbara Tversky, Motoko Ohgishi, Diane J. Schiano, Descriptions of Simple Spatial Scenes in English and Japanese Spatial Cognition and Computation. ,vol. 3, pp. 3- 42 ,(2003) , 10.1207/S15427633SCC0301_2
Heather Bortfeld, Susan E. Brennan, Use and acquisition of idiomatic expressions in referring by native and non‐native speakers Discourse Processes. ,vol. 23, pp. 119- 147 ,(1997) , 10.1080/01638537709544986
Richard J. Gerrig, Susan E. Brennan, Justina O. Ohaeri, What Can We Conclude From Speakers Behaving Badly Discourse Processes. ,vol. 29, pp. 173- 178 ,(2000) , 10.1207/S15326950DP2902_5
Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky, Gordon D. Logan, The Influence of Reference Frame Selection on Spatial Template Construction Journal of Memory and Language. ,vol. 37, pp. 411- 437 ,(1997) , 10.1006/JMLA.1997.2519
Xiaoou Li, Laura A. Carlson, Weimin Mou, Mark R. Williams, Jared E. Miller, Describing spatial locations from perception and memory: The influence of intrinsic axes on reference object selection Journal of Memory and Language. ,vol. 65, pp. 222- 236 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JML.2011.04.001