Sponsoring literacy: borderland communities and student identities in an academic support program

作者: Aimee Cheree Mapes

DOI: 10.17077/ETD.1LIJS1SK

关键词:

摘要: While much has been written about the efficacy of academic support programs for increasing retention rates university students deemed academically underprepared, few studies examine how engage classroom with an emphasis on expressions literacy. This qualitative study responds to recent calls in student development literature more into particular practices programs. Focused exemplar program at a larger, public American Midwest, gathered perspectives underprepared students, teasing out differences administrators’, instructors’, and students’ voices. Insights from revealed that explicit metaphors programmatic discourse emphasized skills model utopian safe houses. In classroom, however, five focal suggested literacy learning was far complex. particular, data generative potential sociocultural theory conceptualizing praxis program. Examining responded complex showed engagement intricate than strong rates. First, close analysis discourses appropriation skills; it ways discerning which use different communities signal one’s role these communities. Second, community borderland difference rather house. Finally, illustrated opportunities creative improvisation performances integral engagement. The findings have insights conceptualize pedagogy related emergent theories Third Space. Specifically,

参考文章(151)
Trudy Smoke, What Is the Future of Basic Writing Journal of Basic Writing. ,vol. 20, pp. 88- 96 ,(2001) , 10.37514/JBW-J.2001.20.2.08
Mina P. Shaughnessy, Diving IN: An Introduction to Basic Writing. College Composition and Communication. ,vol. 27, pp. 234- ,(1976) , 10.2307/357036
J. Elkins, A. Luke, Special themed issue: Re/mediating adolescent literacies Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. ,vol. 43, pp. 396- 398 ,(2000)
A. Suresh Canagarajah, Safe Houses in the Contact Zone: Coping Strategies of African-American Students in the Academy. College Composition and Communication. ,vol. 48, pp. 173- ,(1997) , 10.2307/358665
Colin Lankshear, Michele Knobel, New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning British Journal of Educational Studies. ,vol. 52, ,(2003)
Min-Zhan Lu, Conflict and Struggle: The Enemies or Preconditions of Basic Writing? College English. ,vol. 54, pp. 887- 913 ,(1992) , 10.2307/378444
Kathleen A. Hinchman, Constance A. Steinkuehler, Rebecca W. Black, Deborah R. Dillon, Katherine A. Clinton, Joseph Tobin, New Directions in Research: Contemporary Qualitative Research Methodologies and Issues in Literacy Education. Reading Research Quarterly. ,vol. 40, pp. 90- 110 ,(2005)
Kathleen Blake Yancey, Reflection in the writing classroom ,(1998)