Animals in Research

作者: Steven J. Smith

DOI: 10.1001/JAMA.1988.03720130071033

关键词:

摘要: THIS COMMENTARY is an appeal to American physicians and scientists assume a primary role in defending the use of animals for biomedical research. The historical physician Medical Association (AMA) preserving research was recently reviewed. 1 Few if any Americans—physicians, scientists, or laypersons— would argue against need humane treatment However, balance must be achieved between assurance that are treated humanely legislation severely restrict impede medical progress. Well-financed determined opponents animal have devised potent strategy dismantle through series legislative regulatory initiatives designed increase its cost. These place future health humans at risk ( Washingtonian , vol 21, 1986, p 112; US News World Rep Aug 31,1987, 48). 2-4 Most individuals

参考文章(6)
Dennis M. Feeney, Human rights and animal welfare. American Psychologist. ,vol. 42, pp. 593- 599 ,(1987) , 10.1037//0003-066X.42.6.593
Fred Rosner, Is Animal Experimentation Being Threatened by Animal Rights Groups? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 254, pp. 1942- 1943 ,(1985) , 10.1001/JAMA.1985.03360140100033
Steven J. Smith, Use of Animals in Biomedical Research Archives of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 148, pp. 1849- 1853 ,(1988) , 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1988.00380080113030
W. B. CANNON, The Responsibility of the General Practitioner for Freedom of Medical Research The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 161, pp. 428- 432 ,(1909) , 10.1056/NEJM190909231611302
Shapiro Hm, Animal rights and biomedical research: no place for complacency. Anesthesiology. ,vol. 64, pp. 142- ,(1986)
U.S. Congress, Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing, and Education U.S. Government Printing Office. ,(1986)