Methods for quantifying ordinal variables: a comparative study

作者: Sara Casacci , Adriano Pareto

DOI: 10.1007/S11135-014-0063-2

关键词:

摘要: The solution to the problem of ‘quantification’ or scoring, i.e., assigning real numbers qualitative modalities (categories) an ordinal variable, is primary relevance in data analysis. literature offers a wide variety quantification methods, all with their pros and cons. In this work, we present comparison between univariate multivariate approach. approach allows estimate category values variable from observed frequencies on basis distributional assumption. simultaneously transforms set variables into interval scales through process called optimal scaling. As example application, consider Bank Italy coming “Survey Household Income Wealth” order ‘quantify’ self-rating item happiness. A simulation study compare performance two approaches also presented.

参考文章(31)
Monica Th. Markus, Bootstrap confidence regions in nonlinear multivariate analysis DSWO Press, Leiden University. ,(1994)
Jarl Kampen, Marc Swyngedouw, The ordinal controversy revisited Quality & Quantity. ,vol. 34, pp. 87- 102 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1004785723554
Michael Argyle, Causes and correlates of happiness. Russell Sage Foundation. ,(1999)
L. L. Thurstone, Attitudes Can Be Measured American Journal of Sociology. ,vol. 33, pp. 529- 554 ,(1928) , 10.1086/214483
Leandre R. Fabrigar, Duane T. Wegener, Robert C. MacCallum, Erin J. Strahan, Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods. ,vol. 4, pp. 272- 299 ,(1999) , 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Forrest W. Young, Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Data. Psychometrika. ,vol. 46, pp. 357- 388 ,(1981) , 10.1007/BF02293796
Michael Patrick Allen, Conventional and Optimal Interval Scores for Ordinal Variables Sociological Methods & Research. ,vol. 4, pp. 475- 494 ,(1976) , 10.1177/004912417600400405