Capítulo 15. El sistema de revisión por expertos (peer review) en las revistas científicas: ventajas y limitaciones
作者： S. Lorenzo , G. Carrasco
DOI: 10.1016/B978-84-8086-461-9.50023-0
关键词:
摘要:
unirioja.es
sci-hub.st 参考文章(29)
Richard Smith, Can medical journals lead or must they follow The Medical Journal of Australia. ,vol. 183, pp. 665- 668 ,(2005) , 10.5694/J.1326-5377.2005.TB00072.X
Esteve Fernández, Ana M. García, El proceso de publicación de un artículo: autores, revisores externos y editores Quaderns de la Fundació Dr. Antoni Esteve. pp. 103- 117 ,(2007)
J. R. Porter, THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL—300TH ANNIVERSARY1 Bacteriological Reviews. ,vol. 28, pp. 210- 230 ,(1964) , 10.1128/BR.28.3.210-230.1964
John C. Burnham, The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 263, pp. 1323- 1329 ,(1990) , 10.1001/JAMA.1990.03440100023003
Gregory D. Curfman, Stephen Morrissey, George J. Annas, Jeffrey M. Drazen, Peer review in the balance. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 358, pp. 2276- 2277 ,(2008) , 10.1056/NEJME0803516
Joseph M. Garfunkel, Problems Identified by Secondary Review of Accepted Manuscripts JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 263, pp. 1369- 1371 ,(1990) , 10.1001/JAMA.1990.03440100077011
Fernando Rodríguez Artalejo, Ocultar la Identidad de los Autores y Evaluadores de Artículos Gaceta Sanitaria. ,vol. 10, pp. 159- 160 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0213-9111(96)71890-3
John C. Roberts, Effects of Peer Review and Editing on the Readability of Articles Published in Annals of Internal Medicine JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 272, pp. 119- 121 ,(1994) , 10.1001/JAMA.1994.03520020045012
Thomas P. Stossel, Reviewer Status and Review Quality New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 312, pp. 658- 659 ,(1985) , 10.1056/NEJM198503073121024
Daniel S Hamermesh, Facts and Myths about Refereeing Journal of Economic Perspectives. ,vol. 8, pp. 153- 163 ,(1994) , 10.1257/JEP.8.1.153