Problems Identified by Secondary Review of Accepted Manuscripts

摘要: To test the hypothesis that no important deficits would be identified on further review of accepted manuscripts, and such manuscripts recommended for publication rereview, we sent had been publication, after revision, rereview by new referees who were unaware status manuscripts. Each was evaluated independently two assistant editors to determine whether substantive criticisms reviewers. The majority thought reviewers have defects warranted but problems noted often dissimilar. However, 80% others judged suitable although not at a high priority. frequently differed in their judgments given criticism reviewer revision; nevertheless, there infrequent disagreement regarding basic decision acceptance or rejection. ( JAMA . 1990;263:1369-1371)