Effect of hearing aid bandwidth on speech recognition performance of listeners using a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing).

作者: Arlene C. Neuman , Mario A. Svirsky

DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0B013E31828E86E8

关键词:

摘要: Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine how the bandwidth hearing aid (HA) fitting affects bimodal speech recognition listeners with a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear and severe-to-profound loss unimplanted (but residual sufficient for wideband amplification using National Acoustic Laboratories Revised, Profound [NAL-RP] prescriptive guidelines; unaided thresholds no poorer than 95 dB HL through 2000 Hz). Design Recognition sentence material quiet noise measured CI alone plus HA as provided by high mid-frequency regions systematically reduced from condition (NAL-RP prescription). Modified bandwidths included upper frequency cutoffs 2000, 1000, or 500 Hz. Results On average, significant benefit obtained when at all frequencies aidable hearing. Limiting only low-frequency (below 1000 Hz) did not yield improvements performance over listening alone. Conclusions These data suggest importance providing across wide region permitted audiometric used users.

参考文章(35)
Jafar Hamzavi, Stefan Marcel Pok, Wolfgang Gstoettner, Wolf-dieter Baumgartner, Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. International Journal of Audiology. ,vol. 43, pp. 61- 65 ,(2004) , 10.1080/14992020400050010
G. Keidser, H.R. Dillon, M. Flax, T. Ching, S. Brewer, The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure Audiology research. ,vol. 1, pp. 24- ,(2011) , 10.4081/AUDIORES.2011.E24
C. Morera, M. Manrique, A. Ramos, L. Garcia-Ibanez, L. Cavalle, A. Huarte, C. Castillo, E. Estrada, Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Oto-laryngologica. ,vol. 125, pp. 596- 606 ,(2005) , 10.1080/00016480510027493
Michael F. Dorman, Rene H. Gifford, Anthony J. Spahr, Sharon A. McKarns, The Benefits of Combining Acoustic and Electric Stimulation for the Recognition of Speech, Voice and Melodies Audiology and Neuro-otology. ,vol. 13, pp. 105- 112 ,(2008) , 10.1159/000111782
Ying-Yee Kong, Ginger S. Stickney, Fan-Gang Zeng, Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 117, pp. 1351- 1361 ,(2005) , 10.1121/1.1857526
Marlene Bagatto, Sheila Moodie, Susan Scollie, Richard Seewald, Shane Moodie, John Pumford, K. P. Rachel Liu, Clinical Protocols for Hearing Instrument Fitting in the Desired Sensation Level Method Trends in Amplification. ,vol. 9, pp. 199- 226 ,(2005) , 10.1177/108471380500900404
Ruth Y. Litovsky, Patti M. Johnstone, Shelly P. Godar, Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children International Journal of Audiology. ,vol. 45, pp. 78- 91 ,(2006) , 10.1080/14992020600782956
Gitte Keidser, Richard Katsch, Denis Byrne, Harvey Dillon, Teresa Ching, NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. Journal of The American Academy of Audiology. ,vol. 12, pp. 37- 51 ,(2001)
C James, P Blamey, M Armstrong, P Pegg, Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. American Journal of Otology. ,vol. 18, ,(1997)