Termination of pregnancy after positive result for fetal anomaly due to second trimester ultrasonography screening: an appraisal.

作者: Wiwanitkit

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Prenatal diagnosis is widely practiced in obstetrics. The main aim of such tests early detect ion the fetal anomaly so that proper management can be selected. One common diagnostic tools second trimester ultrasonography screening. This technique has proved to cost effective. For positive cases this screening technique, termination pregnancy an important outcome. depends on several factors including medical, social and legal each setting. author hereby appraises rate after having derived results from published papers settings. First, specific literature search for detection was done using standard researching referencing databases (PubMed, Scopus SciCitationIndex). includion set as any reports English. exclusion lack complete data prevalence (positivity) rate. Metanalysis done. ANOVA used assessing differences among Statistically significant difference at P value equal or less than 0.05 According work, there were 8 (1–8) 75264 screenings. reported ranges 043% 3.0% without different Overall 1.48%. 0.141% 0.61% overall 0.35%. 4.8% 55%, with a found rates abnormality detected by studies are within same range. In addition, finalized also do not differ. However, it seen screened highly variable. confirms decision totally depending Although useful, usefulness havsmany underlying factors. concordant statement Rasch et al effect socio-economic situation country birth (9).

参考文章(10)
Apichart Chittacharoen, Panyu Panburana, Nopadol Saropala, Adithep Jaovisidha, Rasig Roungsipragarn, Somsri Pitukkijronnakorn, Yongyuth Herabutya, Thavat Jetsawangsri, The value of mid-trimester routine ultrasonographic screening in antenatal detection of congenital malformations. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet. ,vol. 92, pp. 748- ,(2009)
J.Peter VanDorsten, Thomas C. Hulsey, Roger B. Newman, M.Kathryn Menard, Fetal anomaly detection by second-trimester ultrasonography in a tertiary center American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 178, pp. 742- 749 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70484-3
AULlKKl SAARI-KEMPPAINEN, OLAVl KARJALAINEN, PEKKA YLOSTALO, OLLl P. HEINONEN, Ultrasound Screening and Perinatal Mortality: Controlled Trial of Systematic One-stage Screening in Pregnancy The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. ,vol. 46, pp. 435- 436 ,(1991) , 10.1097/00006254-199107000-00004
N Anderson, O Boswell, G Duff, Prenatal sonography for the detection of fetal anomalies : results of a prospective study and comparison with prior series American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 165, pp. 943- 950 ,(1995) , 10.2214/AJR.165.4.7676997
Isabel M. Shirley, Fiona Bottomley, Victor P. Robinson, Routine radiographer screening for fetal abnormalities by ultrasound in an unselected low risk population. British Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 65, pp. 564- 569 ,(1992) , 10.1259/0007-1285-65-775-564
A. Saari-Kemppainen, O. Karjalainen, P. Ylostalo, O.P. Heinonen, Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy The Lancet. ,vol. 336, pp. 387- 391 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91941-3
V. Rasch, T. Gammeltoft, L. B. Knudsen, C. Tobiassen, A. Ginzel, L. Kempf, Induced abortion in Denmark: Effect of Socio-economic situation and country of birth European Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 18, pp. 144- 149 ,(2007) , 10.1093/EURPUB/CKM112
Bernard G Ewigman, James P Crane, Fredric D Frigoletto, Michael L LeFevre, Raymond P Bain, Donald McNellis, RADIUS Study Group, Effect of Prenatal Ultrasound Screening on Perinatal Outcome The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 329, pp. 821- 827 ,(1993) , 10.1056/NEJM199309163291201