Identifying key assumptions and differences in life cycle assessment studies of lithium-ion traction batteries with focus on greenhouse gas emissions

作者: Linda Ager-Wick Ellingsen , Christine Roxanne Hung , Anders Hammer Strømman

DOI: 10.1016/J.TRD.2017.06.028

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The various studies that consider the life cycle environmental impacts of lithium-ion traction batteries report widely different results. This article evaluates inventory data and results to identify key assumptions differences in studies. To aid identification, we compile reported greenhouse gas emissions batteries. find production-related range 38–356 kg CO 2 -eq/kW h. One main sources large variations stems from differing regarding direct energy demand associated with cell manufacture pack assembly. Further are due amount materials other battery components. indirect use phase depend on conversion losses battery, required transport weight carbon intensity electricity. Of reviewed assessing phase, all estimate while only one considers mass-induced requirement. Although there several industrial end-of-life treatment alternatives for batteries, very few this stage. Studies using “recycled content” approach 3.6–27 kg -eq/kW h “end-of-life“ emission reductions 16–32 kg battery. uncertainty is high as availability process limited. Based our findings, discuss how may be reduced.

参考文章(29)
R. Nealer, T. P. Hendrickson, Review of Recent Lifecycle Assessments of Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Electric Vehicles Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports. ,vol. 2, pp. 66- 73 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S40518-015-0033-X
Christian Hanisch, Jan Diekmann, Alexander Stieger, Wolfgang Haselrieder, Arno Kwade, Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries Handbook of Clean Energy Systems. pp. 1- 24 ,(2018) , 10.1002/9781118991978.HCES221
Linda Ager-Wick Ellingsen, Guillaume Majeau-Bettez, Anders Hammer Strømman, Comment on “The significance of Li‐ion batteries in electric vehicle life‐cycle energy and emissions and recycling's role in its reduction” in Energy & Environmental Science Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 19, pp. 518- 519 ,(2015) , 10.1111/JIEC.12309
Troy R. Hawkins, Ola Moa Gausen, Anders Hammer Strømman, Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 17, pp. 997- 1014 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S11367-012-0440-9
Constantine Samaras, Kyle Meisterling, Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 42, pp. 3170- 3176 ,(2008) , 10.1021/ES702178S
Dominic A. Notter, Marcel Gauch, Rolf Widmer, Patrick Wäger, Anna Stamp, Rainer Zah, Hans-Jörg Althaus, Contribution of Li-Ion Batteries to the Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicles Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 44, pp. 6550- 6556 ,(2010) , 10.1021/ES903729A
Guillaume Majeau-Bettez, Troy R. Hawkins, Anders Hammer Strømman, Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Lithium-Ion and Nickel Metal Hydride Batteries for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 45, pp. 4548- 4554 ,(2011) , 10.1021/ES103607C
David L. Wood, Jianlin Li, Claus Daniel, Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries Journal of Power Sources. ,vol. 275, pp. 234- 242 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2014.11.019
Grietus Mulder, Noshin Omar, Stijn Pauwels, Marcel Meeus, Filip Leemans, Bavo Verbrugge, Wouter De Nijs, Peter Van den Bossche, Daan Six, Joeri Van Mierlo, Comparison of commercial battery cells in relation to material properties Electrochimica Acta. ,vol. 87, pp. 473- 488 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ELECTACTA.2012.09.042
Naoki Nitta, Feixiang Wu, Jung Tae Lee, Gleb Yushin, Li-ion battery materials: present and future Materials Today. ,vol. 18, pp. 252- 264 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.MATTOD.2014.10.040