A shift in strategy or "error"? Strategy classification over multiple stochastic specifications

作者: Clintin P. Davis-Stober , Nicholas Brown

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: We present a classification methodology that jointly assign s to decision maker best-fitting strategy for set of choice data as well stochastic speci fication strategy. Our utilize normalized maximum likelihood model selection criterion compare multiple, possibly non-nested, specifications candidate strategies. In addition sing le with “error” specifications, we cons ider mixture i.e., strategies comprised probabilit y distribution over multiple this way, our approach generalizes the framework Brode r and Schiffer (2003a). apply an existing dataset find some makers are best fi t by single varying levels error, while others described using specification ov er

参考文章(66)
Thomas R. Stewart, Chapter 2 Judgment Analysis: Procedures Advances in Psychology. ,vol. 54, pp. 41- 74 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62170-6
Enrica Carbone, John D. Hey, Which Error Story is Best Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. ,vol. 20, pp. 161- 176 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1007829024107
Klaus Fiedler, How to study cognitive decision algorithms: The case of the priority heuristic Judgment and Decision Making. ,vol. 5, pp. 21- 32 ,(2010)
Robert C. MacCallum, Kristopher J. Preacher, Li Cai, Alternatives to Traditional Model Comparison Strategies for Covariance Structure Models Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ,(2007)
Günter M. Ziegler, Lectures on Polytopes ,(1994)
Gerd Gigerenzer, Daniel G. Goldstein, Betting on one good reason : The Take the Best heuristic Oxford University Press. pp. 75- 95 ,(1999)
Benjamin E. Hilbig, Precise models deserve precise measures: A methodological dissection Judgment and Decision Making. ,vol. 5, pp. 272- 284 ,(2010)
Quang H. Vuong, Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses Econometrica. ,vol. 57, pp. 307- 333 ,(1989) , 10.2307/1912557