Behavioural Phenotypes and Special Educational Needs: Is Aetiology Important in the Classroom?

作者: C. Reilly

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2788.2012.01542.X

关键词:

摘要: Background  A number of genetic conditions with associated intellectual disability and/or special educational needs have increasingly well-defined behavioural phenotypes. Thus, the concept ‘behavioural phenotype’ and aetiology may be important regard to school-based interventions. Method  The evidence for distinctive cognitive aspects five most common syndromes (Down syndrome, fragile X Williams Prader–Willi syndrome velo-cardio-facial syndrome) is reviewed respect key studies findings. possible utility aetiology-related interventions in education discussed reference arguments against such approaches published guidelines research. Results  Behavioural phenotypes are probabilistic many children a specific will share commonalities other within variability not uncommon. There that teachers parents limited knowledge proposed behaviour profiles syndromes. While there area learning each amount efficacy school settings. Conclusion  It likely knowing child's helpful staff who work settings relation implications. However, how might inform teaching practice or has been studied. model help educators about role classroom.

参考文章(105)
Janis B. Foy, Henareet Singh, Kenneth M. Cramer, Elizabeth M. Starr, How Are Schools Doing? Parental Perceptions of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders, Down Syndrome and Learning Disabilities: A Comparative Analysis Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities. ,vol. 41, pp. 315- 332 ,(2006)
Linda Cupples, Teresa Iacono, The efficacy of `whole word' versus `analytic' reading instruction for children with Down syndrome Reading and Writing. ,vol. 15, pp. 549- 574 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1016385114848
Hodapp Rm, Dykens Em, Evans Dw, Profiles and development of adaptive behavior in children with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation. ,vol. 98, pp. 580- 587 ,(1994)
R M Hodapp, E M Dykens, S S Sparrow, S I Ort, J F Leckman, D G Zelinsky, K-ABC profiles in children with fragile X syndrome, Down syndrome, and nonspecific mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation. ,vol. 97, pp. 39- 46 ,(1992)
Kathleen Koenig, Ami Klin, Robert Schultz, Deficits in social attribution ability in Prader-Willi syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. ,vol. 34, pp. 573- 582 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S10803-004-2551-Z
Scott S. Hall, Treatments for fragile X syndrome: A closer look at the data Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. ,vol. 15, pp. 353- 360 ,(2009) , 10.1002/DDRR.78
Sibel Kazak Berument, Michael Rutter, Catherine Lord, Andrew Pickles, Anthony Bailey, Autism screening questionnaire: Diagnostic validity British Journal of Psychiatry. ,vol. 175, pp. 444- 451 ,(1999) , 10.1192/BJP.175.5.444
Robert M. Hodapp, Jean L. DesJardin, Leila A. Ricci, Genetic Syndromes of Mental Retardation: Should They Matter for the Early Interventionist?. Infants and Young Children. ,vol. 16, pp. 152- 160 ,(2003) , 10.1097/00001163-200304000-00007