Short implants versus longer implants in the posterior alveolar region after an observation period of at least five years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
作者： Xinxin Xu , Jiao Huang , Xuewei Fu , Yunchun Kuang , Hui Yue
DOI: 10.1016/J.JDENT.2020.103386
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Objectives This meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes, including survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), and technical biological complications of short implants ( Sources Electronic (via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) manual searches were performed for articles published prior to November 29, 2019. Study selection The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019140718). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing standard in the same study after an observation period at least five years included. Data Nine RCTs included this study. rates Conclusions results indicate that although rate maxilla may be lower than long implants, mandible is similar can result a complications. conclusions should interpreted caution due limited numbers participants implants. Clinical Significance When selecting length surgeons consider location implant placement, their own experience, incidence
sci-hub.st 参考文章(43)
Jacopo Buti, Gioacchino Cannizzaro, Pietro Felice, Vittorio Ferri, Marco Esposito, Michele Leone, Immediate loading of fixed cross-arch prostheses supported by flapless-placed supershort or long implants: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology. ,vol. 8, pp. 27- 36 ,(2015)
Roberto Pistilli, Gioacchino Cannizzaro, Pietro Felice, Carlo Barausse, Marco Esposito, Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up European Journal of Oral Implantology. ,vol. 7, pp. 359- 369 ,(2014)
D. S. Thoma, M. Zeltner, J. Hüsler, C. H. F. Hämmerle, R. E. Jung, EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 26, pp. 154- 169 ,(2015) , 10.1111/CLR.12615
Jie Qian, Ann Wennerberg, Tomas Albrektsson, Reasons for Marginal Bone Loss around Oral Implants Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. ,vol. 14, pp. 792- 807 ,(2012) , 10.1111/CID.12014
L. Le Guéhennec, A. Soueidan, P. Layrolle, Y. Amouriq, Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration Dental Materials. ,vol. 23, pp. 844- 854 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2006.06.025
Fabio Rossi, Daniele Botticelli, Gianfranco Cesaretti, Enzo De Santis, Stefano Storelli, Niklaus P. Lang, Use of short implants (6 mm) in a single‐tooth replacement: a 5‐year follow‐up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 27, pp. 458- 464 ,(2016) , 10.1111/CLR.12564
Sung-Ah Lee, Chun-Teh Lee, Martin Fu, Waeil Elmisalati, Sung-Kiang Chuang, Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (> 8 mm) in vertically augmented sites. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 29, pp. 1085- 1097 ,(2014) , 10.11607/JOMI.3504
Hyo-Sang Park, Youn-Ju Lee, Seong-Hwa Jeong, Tae-Geon Kwon, None, Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. ,vol. 133, pp. 30- 37 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.AJODO.2006.01.044
Marcelo Coelho Goiato, DM Dos Santos, JF Jr Santiago, A Moreno, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, None, Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. ,vol. 43, pp. 1108- 1116 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.IJOM.2014.02.016
Dominic O'Sullivan, Lars Sennerby, Daryll Jagger, Neil Meredith, A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. ,vol. 6, pp. 48- 57 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1708-8208.2004.TB00027.X