A comparative analysis of negative contingency learning in humans and nonhumans.

作者: Douglas A. Williams

DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60559-9

关键词:

摘要: This chapter discusses that comparative analysis of human and nonhuman learning reveals many parallels in the cognitive process detects negative interevent relations. There are two ways interpreting parallels. First, evolution has equipped nervous system humans nonhumans with a primitive contingency detection mechanism. mechanism is associative readily embodied connectionist model. Presumably, these associations learn implicitly, products available for conscious report by humans. If result single mechanism, behavioral tests continues to reveal similarities behavior nonhumans. With continued study, it should eventually all there know about precise nature this A second way attribute them analogous mechanisms rather than homologous ones. Faced problem adapting temporal regularities, different adaptive might have stumbled upon similar solutions. Like wings birds bats, but not same. Linear coding also allows subjects rapidly generalize their new situation. It impossible fully equate conditions learning, so any observed differences could be task specific species specific.

参考文章(114)
H. L. Roitblat, Jean-Arcady Meyer, Comparative approaches to cognitive science MIT Press. ,(1995)
Evan Fales, Edward A. Wasserman, Causal knowledge: What can psychology teach philosophers Journal of Mind and Behavior. ,vol. 13, pp. 1- 28 ,(1992)
L. J. Kamin, Attention-like processes in classical conditioning Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior : Aversive stimulation. pp. 9- 31 ,(1967)
James L.. McClelland, David E.. Rumelhart, Parallel distributed processing research group, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models ,(1986)
Robert A Rescorla, None, A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement Classical conditioning II : Current research and theory. pp. 64- 99 ,(1972)
Peter Balsam, Arthur Tomie, Context and Learning Psychology Press. ,(1985) , 10.4324/9781315802466
Norman E. Spear, Ralph R. Miller, Information processing in animals : conditioned inhibition L. Erlbaum Associates. ,(1985)
David R. Shanks, Anthony Dickinson, Associative Accounts of Causality Judgment Psychology of Learning and Motivation. ,vol. 21, pp. 229- 261 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60030-4