Article 106 TFEU is Dead. Long Live Article 106 TFEU

作者: Tarjei Bekkedal

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-6704-734-0_4

关键词:

摘要: This chapter raises the question of purpose Article 106 TFEU (ex 86 EC). 106(2) is traditionally seen as a derogation to Treaty provisions and has an awkward role in Chapter on competition. Bekkedal notes conventional reading provision that it autonomous exception all not confined specific types infringement TFEU. The view also takes position can be invoked by Member States undertakings. Bekkedal, contrast, radical view. He argues only makes point should turned into general clause EU law because primarily targeted at economic objectives. In relation fundamental free movement objectives are not, principle, accepted legitimate justifications rules. European Courts take softer approach application principle proportionality when applying TFEU, whereas classical strict: ‘a least restrictive alternative’ assessment challenged restriction competition cross-border trade. If applied with these standards for review, could compromise Internal Market project. finds new considered value statement fulfilling concept ‘European Social Model.’

参考文章(31)
Giuliano Marenco, Competition Between National Economies and Competition Between Businesses--A Response to Judge Pescatore Fordham International Law Journal. ,vol. 10, pp. 420- ,(1986)
José Luis Buendia Sierra, Andrew Read, Exclusive rights and state monopolies under EC law : Article 86 (formerly Article 90) of the EC Treaty Oxford University Press. ,(1999)
Wulf-Henning Roth, Mads Andenas, Services and free movement in EU law Oxford University Press. ,(2002)
Christopher Newdick, Citizenship, free movement and health care: Cementing individual rights by corroding social solidarity Common Market Law Review. ,vol. 43, pp. 1645- 1668 ,(2006)
Grainne De Burca, Paul P. Craig, The Evolution of EU Law ,(2011)