National Interest and European Law in the Legislation and Juridical Practice on Health Care Services – In the Light of the Reforms of the Hungarian Health Care System

作者: István Hoffman

DOI: 10.17573/IPAR.2015.1.07

关键词:

摘要: The priority of the national interest in field health care policy is secured by rules TFEU, Charter Fundamental Rights of the European Union and secondary law as well. Although several market-type pro-competitive solutions have appeared, they can have only limited influence on systems. main reasons the limited EU regulations are primary responsibilities of Member States, widely applicable public exceptions, and application competition rules. the national legislation is determinative, free movement persons services could be applied the health services. This principle was recognized landmark decisions Court Justice (ECJ). Directive 2011/24/EU based on these principles a has evolved. Because the competition creation single care area just begun, “silent revolution” service provision has minor importance. practice ECJ been focused on the use cross-border States had a broad margin for organisation management this service. The role this field Therefore strong centralization Hungarian health system from 2011 to 2013 may harmony with legislation, although at level not promoted the reformed care.

参考文章(17)
Tarjei Bekkedal, Article 106 TFEU is Dead. Long Live Article 106 TFEU T. M. C. Asser Press. pp. 61- 102 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-90-6704-734-0_4
Tamara K. Hervey, Jean V. McHale, Health Law and the European Union ,(2004)
Massimo Fabio, Customs Law of the European Union ,(2012)
Gráinne de Búrca, Paul Craig, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials ,(1995)
István Hoffman, Some Thoughts on the Main European Models of the Municipal Health Services Lex Localis-journal of Local Self-government. ,vol. 11, pp. 631- 650 ,(2013) , 10.4335/11.3.631-650(2013)
Eszter Kovacs, Gabor Szocska, Cécile Knai, International patients on operation vacation – perspectives of patients travelling to Hungary for orthopaedic treatments International Journal of Health Policy and Management. ,vol. 3, pp. 333- 340 ,(2014) , 10.15171/IJHPM.2014.113