作者: Josep Crespo Hervás , María Huertas González-Serrano , Ferran Calabuig Moreno , Vicente Prado-Gascó
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: Physical inactivity is one of the most critical issues in our society. Several studies have pointed that during adolescence Activity levels decline most, becoming a period acquisition active lifelong habits. This study aims an understanding variables predict intention being physically (IPA) high school students after completing their education, comparing two different methodologies: Lineal Models (LM) and Comparative Qualitative Analysis (QCA). No research has combined these methodologies before to see school. 307 adolescents from 14 19 years old (Mean=15.64 ±1.12), 55.5% boys, participated research. To get results, Hierarchical Regression Model with steps; 1: Attitude toward Behaviour (ATB), Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC) Subjective Norm (SN); 2: Athletic Identity (AI) Self-concept (PSC) Fuzzy-set (fsQCA) were performed. The first step explain 26% IPA while addition on explains 65% 2 = .38), AI influential aspect (β=.74). Considering fsQCA none conditions crucial condition IPA, although low PBC seem be important not having IPA. Regarding sufficiency, five combinations 70% three where PSC PBC; ATB; ATB (explaining 45%; 60% 43% respectively IPA). In general QCA more explanatory than LM.