Formal monkey linguistics

作者: Philippe Schlenker , Emmanuel Chemla , Anne M. Schel , James Fuller , Jean-Pierre Gautier

DOI: 10.1515/TL-2016-0001

关键词:

摘要: We argue that rich data gathered in experimental primatology the last 40 years can benefit from analytical methods used contemporary linguistics. Focusing on syntactic and especially semantic side, we suggest these could help clarify five questions: (i) what morphology syntax, if any, do monkey calls have? (ii) is ‘lexical meaning’ of individual calls? (iii) how are meanings combined? (iv) or call sequences compete with each other when several appropriate a given situation? (v) did form meaning evolve? address questions case studies pertaining to cercopithecines (Putty-nosed monkeys, Blue Campbell’s monkeys), colobinae (Guereza monkeys King Colobus New World (Titi monkeys). The mostly involves simple calls, but at least one (Campbell’s -oo) find root-suffix structure, possibly compositional semantics. syntax all clear cases finite-state. With respect meaning, nearly concatenation be analyzed as conjunction. But key question concerns division labor between semantics, pragmatics environmental context (‘world’ knowledge change). An apparent dialectal variation semantics krak) arguably away posits sufficiently powerful mechanisms competition among akin scalar implicatures. non-compositionality pyow-hack sequences) further pragmatic principle ‘urgency’, whereby threat-related must come early (another potential – snort-roar might justify assigning non-compositional complex results tentative). Finally, Titi which two re-arranged ways so reflect information about both predator identity location argued not involve syntax/semantics interface, rather fine-grained interaction context. evolution, remarkable preservation function over millions should make it possible lay groundwork for an evolutionary linguistics, illustrate cercopithecine booms, comparative analysis Putty-nosed repertoires. Throughout, aim compare theories than fully adjudicate them, our claims correspondingly modest. hope formal linguistics combining techniques (from does follow under study share non-trivial properties, let alone history, human language).

参考文章(47)
Brandon C. Wheeler, Julia Fischer, Functionally referential signals: a promising paradigm whose time has passed. Evolutionary Anthropology. ,vol. 21, pp. 195- 205 ,(2012) , 10.1002/EVAN.21319
Cristiane Cäsar, Richard W. Byrne, William Hoppitt, Robert J. Young, Klaus Zuberbühler, Evidence for semantic communication in titi monkey alarm calls Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 84, pp. 405- 411 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2012.05.010
Anne Marijke Schel, Klaus Zuberbühler, Responses to leopards are independent of experience in Guereza colobus monkeys Behaviour. ,vol. 146, pp. 1709- 1737 ,(2009) , 10.1163/000579509X12483520922007
Katie Collier, Balthasar Bickel, Carel P. van Schaik, Marta B. Manser, Simon W. Townsend, Language evolution: syntax before phonology? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 281, pp. 20140263- 20140263 ,(2014) , 10.1098/RSPB.2014.0263
Derek Murphy, Stephen E.G. Lea, Klaus Zuberbühler, Male blue monkey alarm calls encode predator type and distance Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 85, pp. 119- 125 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2012.10.015
Kate Arnold, Klaus Zuberbühler, Language evolution: semantic combinations in primate calls. Nature. ,vol. 441, pp. 303- 303 ,(2006) , 10.1038/441303A
Coralie Chevallier, Ira A. Noveck, Tatjana Nazir, Lewis Bott, Valentina Lanzetti, Dan Sperber, Making disjunctions exclusive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 61, pp. 1741- 1760 ,(2008) , 10.1080/17470210701712960
Alban Lemasson, Karim Ouattara, Hélène Bouchet, Klaus Zuberbühler, Speed of call delivery is related to context and caller identity in Campbell’s monkey males Naturwissenschaften. ,vol. 97, pp. 1023- 1027 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S00114-010-0715-6
Robert C. Berwick, Kazuo Okanoya, Gabriel J.L. Beckers, Johan J. Bolhuis, Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong Trends in Cognitive Sciences. ,vol. 15, pp. 113- 121 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.TICS.2011.01.002