Conservation planning under uncertainty in urban development and vegetation dynamics.

作者: David Troupin , Yohay Carmel

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0195429

关键词:

摘要: Systematic conservation planning is a framework for optimally locating and prioritizing areas conservation. An often-noted shortcoming of most studies that they do not address future uncertainty. The selection protected are intended to ensure the long-term persistence biodiversity often based on snapshot current situation, ignoring processes such as climate change. Scenarios, in sense being accounts plausible futures, can be utilized identify area portfolios robust We compared three approaches utilizing scenarios selection: considering full set (all-scenarios portfolio), assuming realization specific scenarios, reference strategy situation (current distributions portfolio). Our objective was compare robustness these terms their relative performance across scenarios. focused breeding bird species Israel's Mediterranean region. simulated urban development vegetation dynamics 60 years into using DINAMICA-EGO, cellular-automata simulation model. For each scenario, we mapped target species' available habitat distribution, identified priority site-selection software MARXAN, constructed aforementioned strategies. then assessed portfolio number which representation targets were met scenario. all-scenarios consistently outperformed other portfolios, more 'errors' (e.g., when an assumed scenario did occur). On average, achieved five additional with (approximately 33 versus 28 species). findings highlight importance broad meaningful rather than relying expected occurrence or worst-case

参考文章(50)
Y. Samoch, Y. Waisel, P. Fein, M. Litav, Expansion rates of maquis in the Judean Mountains. La-Yaaran. ,vol. 30, pp. 6- 28 ,(1980)
Aija S. Kukkala, Atte Moilanen, Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning. Biological Reviews of The Cambridge Philosophical Society. ,vol. 88, pp. 443- 464 ,(2013) , 10.1111/BRV.12008
Audrey Coreau, Gilles Pinay, John D. Thompson, Pierre-Olivier Cheptou, Laurent Mermet, The rise of research on futures in ecology: rebalancing scenarios and predictions Ecology Letters. ,vol. 12, pp. 1277- 1286 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2009.01392.X
Reinaldo Lourival, Martin Drechsler, Matthew E Watts, Edward T Game, Hugh P Possingham, None, Planning for reserve adequacy in dynamic landscapes; Maximizing future representation of vegetation communities under flood disturbance in the Pantanal wetland Diversity and Distributions. ,vol. 17, pp. 297- 310 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1472-4642.2010.00722.X
Heini Kujala, Mark A. Burgman, Atte Moilanen, Treatment of uncertainty in conservation under climate change Conservation Letters. ,vol. 6, pp. 73- 85 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2012.00299.X
Miguel Ângelo Marini, Morgane Barbet-Massin, Leonardo Esteves Lopes, Frédéric Jiguet, Major current and future gaps of Brazilian reserves to protect Neotropical savanna birds Biological Conservation. ,vol. 142, pp. 3039- 3050 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2009.08.002
Lee Hannah, Protected Areas and Climate Change Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. ,vol. 1134, pp. 201- 212 ,(2008) , 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.009
Lee Hannah, Guy Midgley, Sandy Andelman, Miguel Araújo, Greg Hughes, Enrique Martinez-Meyer, Richard Pearson, Paul Williams, Protected area needs in a changing climate Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 5, pp. 131- 138 ,(2007) , 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[131:PANIAC]2.0.CO;2