Frequency and Clinical Utility of Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者: Khang Wen Pang , Jeremy Chee , Somasundaram Subramaniam , Chew Lip Ng

DOI: 10.1007/S11882-020-00972-Y

关键词:

摘要: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) has been gaining recognition as a symptom of COVID-19, but its clinical utility not well defined. To quantify the identifying OD in diagnosis COVID-19 and determine an estimate frequency amongst these patients. PubMed was searched up to 1 August 2020. Meta-analysis A included studies if they compared positive patients (proven by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) negative controls. B described symptoms were explicitly asked questionnaires or interviews smell tests performed. The pooled (17,401 patients, 60 studies) 0.56 (0.47–0.64) differs between detection via testing (0.76 [0.51–0.91]) survey/questionnaire report (0.53 [0.45–0.62]), although reaching statistical significance (p = 0.089). Patients with reported more likely test for (diagnostic odds ratio 11.5 [8.01–16.5], sensitivity 0.48 (0.40 0.56), specificity 0.93 (0.90 0.96), likelihood 6.10 (4.47–8.32) 0.58 (0.52–0.64)). There significant heterogeneity possible publication bias. Frequency greatly across studies. Nevertheless, significantly COVID-19. Patient-reported is highly specific which should be part pre-test screening suspect

参考文章(96)
Damian Hoy, Peter Brooks, Anthony Woolf, Fiona Blyth, Lyn March, Chris Bain, Peter Baker, Emma Smith, Rachelle Buchbinder, Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 65, pp. 934- 939 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2011.11.014
Moher David, Liberati Alessandro, Tetzlaff Jennifer, G Altman Douglas, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement PLoS Medicine. ,vol. 6, pp. e1000097- 1012 ,(2009) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1000097
Joaquim Mullol, Isam Alobid, Franklin Mariño-Sánchez, Llorenç Quintó, Josep de Haro, Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen, Antonio Valero, Cèsar Picado, Concepció Marin, Furthering the understanding of olfaction, prevalence of loss of smell and risk factors: a population-based survey (OLFACAT study) BMJ Open. ,vol. 2, ,(2012) , 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2012-001256
E. Wehling, S. Nordin, T. Espeseth, I. Reinvang, A. J. Lundervold, Unawareness of Olfactory Dysfunction and its Association with Cognitive Functioning in Middle Aged and Old Adults Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. ,vol. 26, pp. 260- 269 ,(2011) , 10.1093/ARCLIN/ACR019
Li Shen, Implement Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Tests Using mada Package of R Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. ,(2014)
I. MORI, Transolfactory neuroinvasion by viruses threatens the human brain. Acta Virologica. ,vol. 59, pp. 338- 349 ,(2015) , 10.4149/AV_2015_04_338
Dara R. Adams, Kristen E. Wroblewski, David W. Kern, Michael J. Kozloski, William Dale, Martha K. McClintock, Jayant M. Pinto, Factors Associated with Inaccurate Self-Reporting of Olfactory Dysfunction in Older US Adults. Chemical Senses. ,vol. 42, pp. 223- 231 ,(2016) , 10.1093/CHEMSE/BJW108
Sanne Boesveldt, Elbrich M Postma, Duncan Boak, Antje Welge-Luessen, Veronika Schöpf, Joel D Mainland, Jeffrey Martens, John Ngai, Valerie B Duffy, Anosmia-A Clinical Review. Chemical Senses. ,vol. 42, pp. 513- 523 ,(2017) , 10.1093/CHEMSE/BJX025
Sara Balduzzi, Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer, How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial Evidence Based Mental Health. ,vol. 22, pp. 153- 160 ,(2019) , 10.1136/EBMENTAL-2019-300117