Tailored chemotherapy based on tumour gene expression analysis: breast cancer patients' misinterpretations and positive attitudes

作者: I. PELLEGRINI , M. RAPTI , J.-M. EXTRA , A. PETRI-CAL , T. APOSTOLIDIS

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2354.2011.01300.X

关键词:

摘要: PELLEGRINI I., RAPTI M., EXTRA J.-M., PETRI-CAL A., APOSTOLIDIS T., FERRERO BACHELOT VIENS P., JULIAN-REYNIER C. & BERTUCCI F. (2011) European Journal of Cancer Care21, 242–250 Tailored chemotherapy based on tumour gene expression analysis: breast cancer patients' misinterpretations and positive attitudes The aim this study was to document how patients perceive their prognosis a tailored treatment analysis, identify the features approach that may impact its clinical application. In-depth interviews were conducted at three French centres with 37 women (35–69 years age) node-positive undergoing an adjuvant regimen defined basis genomic signature predicting outcome after chemotherapy. Several concerns identified. First, some misconceptions about these methods identified due semantic confusions between terms ‘genomic’ ‘genetic’, which generated anxiety uncertainty future. Second, ‘not done’ interpretable’ signatures misinterpreted by associated highly negative connotations. However, use analysis adapt each patient received most approval because it perceived as facilitating personalised medicine. In conclusion, improving quality provider/patient communications should enable play more active part in decision making treatment. This will ensure those who agree have realistic expectations sound deductions final result disclosure process.

参考文章(40)
M. Cappelli, L. Surh, L. Humphreys, S. Verma, D. Logan, A. Hunter, J. Allanson, Measuring women's preferences for breast cancer treatments and BRCA1/BRCA2 testing. Quality of Life Research. ,vol. 10, pp. 595- 607 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1013123915272
S. THORNE, J. OLIFFE, C. KIM-SING, T.G. HISLOP, K. STAJDUHAR, S.R. HARRIS, E.-A. ARMSTRONG, V. OGLOV, Helpful communications during the diagnostic period: an interpretive description of patient preferences. European Journal of Cancer Care. ,vol. 19, pp. 746- 754 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1365-2354.2009.01125.X
Louise Fuks Nielsen, Claus Moldrup, Lay perspective on pharmacogenomics: a literature review. Personalized Medicine. ,vol. 3, pp. 311- 316 ,(2006) , 10.2217/17410541.3.3.311
Ruth March, Kevin Cheeseman, Michael Doherty, Pharmacogenetics--legal, ethical and regulatory considerations. Pharmacogenomics. ,vol. 2, pp. 317- 327 ,(2001) , 10.1517/14622416.2.4.317
François Bertucci, Nathalie Borie, Henri Roche, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Marc Le Doussal, Gaëtan Macgrogan, Stéphane Debono, Agnès Martinec, Isabelle Treilleux, Pascal Finetti, Benjamin Esterni, Jean-Marc Extra, Jean Geneve, Fabienne Hermitte, Christian Chabannon, Jocelyne Jacquemier, Anne-Laure Martin, Michel Longy, Dominique Maraninchi, Vincent Fert, Daniel Birnbaum, Patrice Viens, Gene expression profile predicts outcome after anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. ,vol. 127, pp. 363- 373 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S10549-010-1003-Z
Lidewij Henneman, Danielle R.M. Timmermans, Gerrit van der Wal, Public Experiences, Knowledge and Expectations about Medical Genetics and the Use of Genetic Information Community Genetics. ,vol. 7, pp. 33- 43 ,(2004) , 10.1159/000080302
Jan Bogaerts, Fatima Cardoso, Marc Buyse, Sofia Braga, Sherene Loi, Jillian A Harrison, Jacques Bines, Stella Mook, Nuria Decker, Peter Ravdin, Patrick Therasse, Emiel Rutgers, Laura J Van't Veer, Martine Piccart, None, Gene signature evaluation as a prognostic tool: challenges in the design of the MINDACT trial. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 3, pp. 540- 551 ,(2006) , 10.1038/NCPONC0591
Dawn C. Turnquist, John H. Harvey, Barbara L. Andersen, Attributions and adjustment to life-threatening illness. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. ,vol. 27, pp. 55- 65 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.2044-8260.1988.TB00753.X
John S. Shaw, Kimberly L. Bassi, Lay Attitudes toward Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Inherited Diseases. Journal of Health Psychology. ,vol. 6, pp. 405- 423 ,(2001) , 10.1177/135910530100600404