Wound Care: Multicenter Feasibility Study.

作者: Linda Halcon , Angela Lillehei , M. Mark Melin , Alice Shapiro , Carolyn Robinson

DOI: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000475343.03232.11

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to determine a sound recruitment strategy for multisite wound studies address the rising prevalence and incidence chronic wounds identify appropriate adult patient populations with interest establish partnerships their clinicians clinical services as model care feasibility study. DESIGN A pilot SETTING Three clinics located in large, Midwestern metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION convenience sample 3 staff patients lower-extremity from each clinic was interviewed. Medical records all seen during 1 week at reviewed. Outcome measures included characteristics being treated (patient demographics characteristics) treatments used. Barriers opportunities that could be addressed other research strategies identified. MAIN RESULTS facilitators future identified varied within between clinics. Patients reported they willing participate research, although fewer if blinded. received variety across record reviews provided further information about patients, characteristics, barriers CONCLUSIONS Characteristics found vary by site, suggesting tailored methods site may most productive. This suggests successful intervention research.

参考文章(9)
Geri L. Schmotzer, Barriers and facilitators to participation of minorities in clinical trials. Ethnicity & Disease. ,vol. 22, pp. 226- 230 ,(2012)
Susan Sullivan-Bolyai, Carol Bova, Janet A. Deatrick, Kathy Knafl, Margaret Grey, Katherine Leung, Allison Trudeau, Barriers and Strategies for Recruiting Study Participants in Clinical Settings Western Journal of Nursing Research. ,vol. 29, pp. 486- 500 ,(2007) , 10.1177/0193945907299658
S. Guo, L.A. DiPietro, Factors Affecting Wound Healing Journal of Dental Research. ,vol. 89, pp. 219- 229 ,(2010) , 10.1177/0022034509359125
Karen C. Lyon, The Case for Evidence in Wound Care Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. ,vol. 35, pp. 585- 590 ,(2008) , 10.1097/01.WON.0000341471.41191.18
Anabella G. Castillo, Lina Jandorf, Linda D. Thélémaque, Sheba King, Katherine Duhamel, Reported Benefits of Participation in a Research Study Journal of Community Health. ,vol. 37, pp. 59- 64 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10900-011-9416-0
Chandan K. Sen, Gayle M. Gordillo, Sashwati Roy, Robert Kirsner, Lynn Lambert, Thomas K. Hunt, Finn Gottrup, Geoffrey C. Gurtner, Michael T. Longaker, Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair and Regeneration. ,vol. 17, pp. 763- 771 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1524-475X.2009.00543.X
Kelly Bumpus, Michael A. Maier, The ABC’s of Wound Care Current Cardiology Reports. ,vol. 15, pp. 346- 346 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11886-013-0346-6
J. M. Daly, Y. Xu, J. W. Ely, B. T. Levy, A Randomized Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Trial in the Iowa Research Network (IRENE): Study Recruitment Methods and Baseline Results Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. ,vol. 25, pp. 63- 72 ,(2012) , 10.3122/JABFM.2012.01.110054
S. Catt, C. Langridge, L. Fallowfield, D.C. Talbot, V. Jenkins, Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in Phase 1 cancer trials European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 47, pp. 1490- 1497 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.EJCA.2011.02.020