Rank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods – a Comparative Overview
作者： Ewa Roszkowska ,
DOI: 10.15290/OSE.2013.05.65.02
关键词:
摘要: Multicriteria decision making (MCDM) refers to screening, prioritizing, ranking or selecting the alternatives based on human judgment from among a finite set ofalternatives in terms of …
uwb.edu.pl
sci-hub.st 参考文章(30)
W. Krelle, C. L. Hwang, Martin J. Beckmann, Shu-Jen J. Chen, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications ,(1981)
Valerie Belton, Theodor J Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach ,(2001)
H. Raiffa, R. L. Keeney, David W. Rajala, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs ,(1976)
Freerk A. Lootsma, Pieter W.G. Bots, The assignment of scores for output‐based research funding Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. ,vol. 8, pp. 44- 50 ,(1999) , 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199901)8:1<44::AID-MCDA227>3.0.CO;2-H
Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, Ting-Yu Chen, Jih-Chang Wang, A weight-assessing method with habitual domains European Journal of Operational Research. ,vol. 110, pp. 342- 367 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00246-4
Ward Edwards, F.Hutton Barron, SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. ,vol. 60, pp. 306- 325 ,(1994) , 10.1006/OBHD.1994.1087
F.A. Lootsma, A model for the relative importance of the criteria in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART European Journal of Operational Research. ,vol. 94, pp. 467- 476 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00129-8
F. Hutton Barron, Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights Acta Psychologica. ,vol. 80, pp. 91- 103 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0001-6918(92)90042-C
William G. Stillwell, David A. Seaver, Ward Edwards, A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. ,vol. 28, pp. 62- 77 ,(1981) , 10.1016/0030-5073(81)90015-5
F. Hutton Barron, Bruce E. Barrett, Decision quality using ranked attribute weights Management Science. ,vol. 42, pp. 1515- 1523 ,(1996) , 10.1287/MNSC.42.11.1515