Estimating Smallholder Opportunity Costs of REDD+: A Pantropical Analysis from Households to Carbon and Back

作者: Amy Ickowitz , Erin Sills , Claudio de Sassi

DOI: 10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2017.02.022

关键词:

摘要: Summary Compensating forest users for the opportunity costs of foregoing deforestation and degradation was one original distinguishing features REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation Degradation). In early days REDD+, such tropical smallholders were believed to be quite low, but this has increasingly been questioned. A decade after concept proposed, direct payments stakeholders remain rare, while concerns about safeguarding livelihoods are increasing. Households facing restrictions on forest-based activities will have compensated, yet evidence actual households, their distribution, implications efficiency equity is limited. We estimate smallholder in 17 sites six countries across tropics. use household data collected multiple using a uniform methodology. find that per tCO2 emissions less than social ($36) 16 sites; only sites, however, lower 2015 voluntary market price ($3.30). While interest an perspective, it relevant local peoples’ income. calculate examine how these differ households different income groups within each site. poorer face all sites. system conditional with no transactions would earn highest rents flat payments. Our findings highlight heterogeneity asymmetrical distribution between communities bear important consequences both initiatives.

参考文章(51)
Sunderlin W.D., Ekaputri A.D., Sills E.O., Duchelle A.E., Kweka D., Diprose R, Doggart N., Ball S., Lima R., Enright A., Torres J., Hartanto H., Toniolo A., The challenge of establishing REDD+ on the ground: Insights from 23 subnational initiatives in six countries CIFOR Occasional Paper. ,vol. 104, ,(2014) , 10.17528/CIFOR/004491
Wertz-Kanounnikoff S., Estimating the costs of reducing forest emissions: a review of methods. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ,(2008) , 10.17528/CIFOR/002605
Hosny El Lakany, Alain Karsenty, Andy White, Hans Gregersen, Does the opportunity cost approach indicate the real cost of REDD+ ? Rights and realities of paying for REDD+ Rights and resources initiative. ,(2010)
Erin O Sills, Stibniati S Atmadja, Claudio de Sassi, Amy E Duchelle, Demetrius L Kweka, Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo, William D Sunderlin, None, REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). pp. 420- 439 ,(2014) , 10.17528/CIFOR/005202
Prakash Kashwan, Forest Policy, Institutions, and REDD+ in India, Tanzania, and Mexico Global Environmental Politics. ,vol. 15, pp. 95- 117 ,(2015) , 10.1162/GLEP_A_00313
Rhett A. Butler, Lian Pin Koh, Jaboury Ghazoul, REDD in the red: palm oil could undermine carbon payment schemes Conservation Letters. ,vol. 2, pp. 67- 73 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2009.00047.X
Monica Di Gregorio, Maria Brockhaus, Tim Cronin, Efrian Muharrom, Levania Santoso, Sofi Mardiah, Mirjam Büdenbender, Equity and REDD+ in the Media: a Comparative Analysis of Policy Discourses Ecology and Society. ,vol. 18, pp. 39- ,(2013) , 10.5751/ES-05694-180239
Simone C. Bauch, Erin O. Sills, Subhrendu K. Pattanayak, Have We Managed to Integrate Conservation and Development? ICDP Impacts in the Brazilian Amazon World Development. ,vol. 64, pp. 135- 148 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2014.03.009