Intracervical double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation.

摘要: There are numerous methods for cervical ripening although not all of them indicated in women presenting a higher risk uterine hyperstimulation. To compare the efficacy and security two induction labor these pregnancies. Retrospective analysis cohorts consisting pregnant who gave birth from 2016 to 2019 (112 inductions with dinoprostone 112 intracervical double- balloon). statistically significant differences favor deliveries that occurred before 12 h since start (28.6% vs 13.4%, p = 0.005) rate (55.4% 33.9%; 0.001). were no time, percentage delivering within 24 h or beyond, nor type delivery. Additionally, decreased need oxytocin (60.7% 42.9%; 0.001) lower dose when used has been observed group. However, Dinoprostone also minor maternal complications as hyperstimulation (18.8% 3.6%; altered cardiotocography (26.8% 4.5%; No difference found between groups regarding severe complications. presents greater delivery ≤ 12 h, less perfusion than using an double-balloon. is groups. In conclusion, could be effective safe option patients at