Making big tobacco give in: you lose, they win.

作者: Nathaniel Wander , Ruth E Malone

DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075119

关键词:

摘要: Objectives. To better understand how the tobacco industry responds to control activists, we explored Philip Morris’s response demands that consumers in developing countries be informed about smoking risks, and analyzed implications of negotiating with a company.Methods. We reviewed internal documents related materials, constructed case history Morris responded shareholder campaign require health warnings on cigarettes sold worldwide, interactions between (1) socially responsible investment (2) management, (3) institutional investors, (4) competitors.Results. After resisting for 11 years, unilaterally reversed direction, proposed its own labeling initiative. While activists celebrated, president detailed privately company would yield little benefit disproportionately. Activists portrayed as preying poor uneducate...

参考文章(21)
Nick Wilson, George Thomson, Directly eroding tobacco industry power as a tobacco control strategy: lessons for New Zealand? The New Zealand Medical Journal. ,vol. 118, ,(2005)
Michael Ray Hill, Archival Strategies and Techniques ,(1993)
Judith Mackay, Lessons from private statements of the tobacco industry. Bulletin of The World Health Organization. ,vol. 78, pp. 911- 912 ,(2000) , 10.1590/S0042-96862000000700008
Stanton A. Glantz, Edith D. Balbach, Tobacco War: Inside the California Battles ,(2000)
Nathaniel Wander, Ruth E. Malone, Keeping Public Institutions Invested in Tobacco Journal of Business Ethics. ,vol. 73, pp. 161- 176 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S10551-006-9188-0
Nathaniel Wander, Ruth E. Malone, Selling off or selling out? Medical schools and ethical leadership in tobacco stock divestment. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 79, pp. 1017- 1026 ,(2004) , 10.1097/00001888-200411000-00002
Naphtali Offen, Elizabeth A Smith, Ruth E Malone, The perimetric boycott: a tool for tobacco control advocacy Tobacco Control. ,vol. 14, pp. 272- 277 ,(2005) , 10.1136/TC.2005.011247