A requirements negotiation model based on multi-criteria analysis
作者： Hoh In , D. Olson , T. Rodgers
关键词:
摘要: Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. Requirements negotiation is more critical than other factors such as tools, process maturity, and design methods. The WinWin model successfully supports general negotiation. However, making decisions to evaluate alternatives still an ad-hoc process. This paper presents a systematic model, called Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Negotiation (MPARN) assist stakeholders evaluate, negotiate agree upon using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques.
elsevier.com
computer.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(4)
Ward Edwards, F.Hutton Barron, SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. ,vol. 60, pp. 306- 325 ,(1994) , 10.1006/OBHD.1994.1087
Barry Boehm, Prasanta Bose, Ellis Horowitz, Ming June Lee, Software Requirements Negotiation and Renegotiation Aids: A Theory-W Based Spiral Approach international conference on software engineering. pp. 243- 253 ,(1995) , 10.1145/225014.225037
James S. Dyer, Rakesh K. Sarin, Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions Operations Research. ,vol. 27, pp. 810- 822 ,(1979) , 10.1287/OPRE.27.4.810
Hoh In, Barry Boehm, T Rodger, Michael Deutsch, None, Applying WinWin to quality requirements: a case study international conference on software engineering. pp. 555- 564 ,(2001) , 10.5555/381473.381538