作者: G. Beltrame , M.L. Salvetat , M. Chizzolini , G.B. Driussi , P. Busatto
DOI: 10.1177/112067210201200508
关键词:
摘要: PURPOSE. To compare the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy rates associated with three different chamber foldable intraocular lenses (IOL). METHODS. We retrospectively evaluated of PCO Nd:YAG in 1150 eyes two years after standard phacoemulsification a no-stitch 3.5mm clear corneal incision (CCI) in-the-bag implantation one types IOL: 190 received one-piece round-edged hydrogel IOL (Hydroview H60M, Bausch & Lomb); 475 three-piece silicone (AMO PhacoFlex SI-40NB, Allergan); 485 square-edged soft acrylic lens (AcrySof MA60MA, Alcon). RESULTS. The were respectively 43.15% 20.5% Hydroview H60M group, 27.57% 9.68% AMO SI-4ONB 10.5% 2.47% AcrySof MA60MA group. CONCLUSIONS. significantly higher group lower lenses, which combine bioactive constitutive material optic design.