The international society for the study of the lumbar spine : Research trends over time and publication rates

作者: Eugene K. Wai , Liisa Vexler , Robert D. Fraser

DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000249552.62587.73

关键词:

摘要: STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES A retrospective review was conducted to assess trends in research selected for podium presentation at ISSLS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Abstracts of past papers presented ISSLS provide quantified documentation as well insight into future directions. METHODS systematic abstracts performed. Graphical plots each category and aspects study quality were used identify any trends. Univariate multivariate logistical regression analyses factors related eventual publication. RESULTS total 43% focused on the disc, representing single largest area research. There is a linear trend over time toward increased selection basic science decreased clinical papers. Experimental design becoming more frequently selected. In 1978, 80% purely descriptive. By 2002, 42% descriptive, whereas 40% incorporated an experimental design. However, decade, there has been increase proportion randomized controlled trials among compared with or biomechanical 54% all recently went Independent that associated significantly (P < 0.05) higher publication rates included use blinded independent observers (84.6%), (68.4%), (62.3%), statistically positive result (61.8%). CONCLUSION Overall, type improved years regards greater The compare favorably other societies. Factors have identified should be considered

参考文章(55)
F A I Riordan, Short report: Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published? Archives of Disease in Childhood. ,vol. 83, pp. 524- 526 ,(2000) , 10.1136/ADC.83.6.524
William F. Marx, Huy M. Do, David F. Kallmes, Harry J. Cloft, The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 20, pp. 1173- 1177 ,(1999)
Erik von Elm, Michael C Costanza, Bernhard Walder, Martin R Tramèr, More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology. ,vol. 3, pp. 12- 12 ,(2003) , 10.1186/1471-2288-3-12
J. Castillo, R. Garcia-Guasch, I. Cifuentes, Fate of abstracts from the Paris 1995 European Society of Anaesthesiologists meeting European Journal of Anaesthesiology. ,vol. 19, pp. 888- 893 ,(2002) , 10.1017/S0265021502001424
John J. Jasko, James H. Wood, Herbert S. Schwartz, Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual musculoskeletal tumor society meetings. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 415, pp. 98- 103 ,(2003) , 10.1097/01.BLO.0000093902.12372.76
Thomas C. Chalmers, Keynote address: The need for randomized control trials Journal of Clinical Apheresis. ,vol. 2, pp. 105- 111 ,(1984) , 10.1002/JCA.2920020117
Sean A Bydder, David J Joseph, Nigel A Spry, Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual scientific meetings: how does the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists compare? Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. ,vol. 48, pp. 25- 28 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1440-1673.2004.01243.X
Babak Larian, Ali Namazie, Neema Agha, Babak Azizzadeh, Keith Blackwell, Marilene B. Wang, Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. ,vol. 125, pp. 166- 169 ,(2001) , 10.1067/MHN.2001.117870
A. E. Carroll, C. M. Sox, B. A. Tarini, S. Ringold, D. A. Christakis, Does presentation format at the Pediatric Academic Societies' annual meeting predict subsequent publication? Pediatrics. ,vol. 112, pp. 1238- 1241 ,(2003) , 10.1542/PEDS.112.6.1238